Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
|Title: ||Diabetes risk factors, diabetes risk algorithms, and the prediction of future frailty: the Whitehall II prospective cohort study|
|Authors: ||Bouillon, Kim|
Shipley, Martin J.
Akbaraly, Tasnime N.
Tabak, Adam G.
Batty, G. David
Diabetes risk scores
Diabetes risk factors
|Issue Date: ||2013|
|Publisher: ||© Elsevier|
|Citation: ||Bouillon, K. ... et al.,2013. Diabetes risk factors, diabetes risk algorithms, and the prediction of future frailty: the Whitehall II prospective cohort study.. Journal of the American Medical Directors Association (JAMDA): long-term care: management, applied research and clinical issues, 14(11), pp. 851.e1–851.e6.|
|Abstract: ||Objective: To examine whether established diabetes risk factors and diabetes risk algorithms are associated with future frailty.
Design: Prospective cohort study. Risk algorithms at baseline (1997e1999) were the Framingham Offspring, Cambridge, and Finnish diabetes risk scores.
Setting: Civil service departments in London, United Kingdom.
Participants: There were 2707 participants (72% men) aged 45 to 69 years at baseline assessment and free of diabetes.
Measurements: Risk factors (age, sex, family history of diabetes, body mass index, waist circumference, systolic and diastolic blood pressure, antihypertensive and corticosteroid treatments, history of high
blood glucose, smoking status, physical activity, consumption of fruits and vegetables, fasting glucose,
HDL-cholesterol, and triglycerides) were used to construct the risk algorithms. Frailty, assessed during a resurvey in 2007e2009, was denoted by the presence of 3 or more of the following indicators: self reported exhaustion, low physical activity, slow walking speed, low grip strength, and weight loss; “prefrailty” was defined as having 2 or fewer of these indicators.
Results: After a mean follow-up of 10.5 years, 2.8% of the sample was classified as frail and 37.5% as pre-frail. Increased age, being female, stopping smoking, low physical activity, and not having a daily
consumption of fruits and vegetables were each associated with frailty or prefrailty. The Cambridge and Finnish diabetes risk scores were associated with frailty/prefrailty with odds ratios per 1 SD increase (disadvantage) in score of 1.18 (95% confidence interval: 1.09e1.27) and 1.27 (1.17e1.37), respectively.
Conclusion: Selected diabetes risk factors and risk scores are associated with subsequent frailty. Risk scores may have utility for frailty prediction in clinical practice.|
|Description: ||This paper is in closed access.|
|Publisher Link: ||http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jamda.2013.08.016|
|Appears in Collections:||Closed Access (Sport, Exercise and Health Sciences)|
Files associated with this item:
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.