+44 (0)1509 263171
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
|Title: ||The effect of clinician-patient alliance and communication on treatment adherence in mental health care: a systematic review|
|Authors: ||Thompson, Laura|
|Issue Date: ||2012|
|Publisher: ||© The authors. Published by BioMed Central|
|Citation: ||THOMPSON, L. and MCCABE, R., 2012. The effect of clinician-patient alliance and communication on treatment adherence in mental health care: a systematic review. BMC Psychiatry, 12:87.|
|Abstract: ||Background: Nonadherence to mental health treatment incurs clinical and economic burdens. The clinician-patient alliance, negotiated through clinical interaction, presents a critical intervention point. Recent medical reviews of communication and adherence behaviour exclude studies with psychiatric samples. The following examines the impact of clinician-patient alliance and communication on adherence in mental health, identifying the specific mechanisms that mobilise patient engagement.
Methods: In December 2010, a systematic search was conducted in Pubmed, PsychInfo, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, Embase and Cinahl and yielded 6672 titles. A secondary hand search was performed in relevant journals, grey literature and reference.
Results: 23 studies met the inclusion criteria for the review. The methodological quality overall was moderate. 17 studies reported positive associations with adherence, only four of which employed intervention designs. 10 studies examined the association between clinician-patient alliance and adherence. Subjective ratings of clinical communication styles and messages were assessed in 12 studies. 1 study examined the association between
objectively rated communication and adherence. Meta-analysis was not possible due to heterogeneity of methods. Findings were presented as a narrative synthesis.
Conclusions: Clinician-patient alliance and communication are associated with more favourable patient adherence. Further research of observer rated communication would better facilitate the application of findings in clinical practice. Establishing agreement on the tasks of treatment, utilising collaborative styles of communication and discussion of treatment specifics may be important for clinicians in promoting cooperation with regimens. These
findings align with those in health communication. However, the benefits of shared decision making for adherence
in mental health are less conclusive than in general medicine.|
|Description: ||This is an Open Access Article. It is published by BioMed Central under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported Licence (CC BY). Full details of this licence are available at: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/|
|Sponsor: ||This study was supported by funding from the Medical Research Council.|
|Publisher Link: ||http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-244X-12-87|
|Appears in Collections:||Published Articles (Social Sciences)|
Files associated with this item:
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.