Loughborough University
Leicestershire, UK
LE11 3TU
+44 (0)1509 263171
Loughborough University

Loughborough University Institutional Repository

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://dspace.lboro.ac.uk/2134/20075

Title: Does routine breast screening practice over-ride display quality in reporting enriched test sets?
Authors: Chen, Yan
Gale, Alastair G.
Evanoff, Michael
Keywords: Breast screening
FFDM
Performance
Issue Date: 2013
Publisher: © SPIE
Citation: CHEN, Y, GALE, A.G. and EVANOFF, M., 2013. Does routine breast screening practice over-ride display quality in reporting enriched test sets?. IN: Abbey, C.K. and Mello-Thoms, C.R. (eds). Proceedings of SPIE, vol 8673, Medical Imaging 2013: Image Perception, Observer Performance, and Technology Assessment, Lake Buena Vista, Florida, USA, 9th February 2013, 86730V.
Abstract: The performance of a group of 16 American (US) breast screening radiologists in interpreting a number of cases from a recent PERFORMS self-assessment case set which had been carefully selected to exclude small calcifications, using submammographic resolution displays, as compared to a British (UK) group of radiologists using mammographic displays has previously been reported. It was found that the UK group performed better, detecting more cancers with the US participants correctly recalling less. These results were interpreted as due to differences in the displays employed by each group as well as to routine screening differences between the two countries. This current study extended that work with 11 of these experienced US breast screening radiologists further interpreting 20 new PERFORMS mammographic cases using a suitable mammographic clinical workstation. The PERFORMS cases were selected so as to show a range of normal, benign and abnormal appearances. Data from these radiologists were compared to their earlier performance on different PERFORMS cases and sub-clinical displays. Their data were also compared to recent data of 11 UK radiologists reading the same cases, again on clinical workstations as well as to all UK screeners. Despite using equivalent clinical monitors, data indicate differences between the UK and US groups in recall decisions which is not just a function of the countries’ screening approaches. Lower detection of abnormal cases by the US group was found here and reasons for this are explored.
Description: Copyright 2014 Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers. One print or electronic copy may be made for personal use only. Systematic reproduction and distribution, duplication of any material in this paper for a fee or for commercial purposes, or modification of the content of the paper are prohibited.
Sponsor: This work is partly supported by the UK National Health Service Breast Screening Programme.
Version: Published
DOI: 10.1117/12.2007846
URI: https://dspace.lboro.ac.uk/2134/20075
Publisher Link: http://dx.doi.org/10.1117/12.2007846
ISSN: 0277-786X
Appears in Collections:Conference Papers and Presentations (Computer Science)

Files associated with this item:

File Description SizeFormat
86730V Does routine breast screening practice over ride display quality.pdfPublished version366.63 kBAdobe PDFView/Open

 

SFX Query

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.