Loughborough University
Leicestershire, UK
LE11 3TU
+44 (0)1509 263171
Loughborough University

Loughborough University Institutional Repository

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://dspace.lboro.ac.uk/2134/20080

Title: Formulating solutions in mediation
Authors: Stokoe, Elizabeth
Sikveland, Rein O.
Keywords: Mediation
Applied conversation analysis
Solution-focused questions
Issue Date: 2016
Publisher: © Elsevier
Citation: STOKOE, E. and SIKVELAND, R.O., 2016. Formulating solutions in mediation. Journal of Pragmatics, 105 pp.101-113.
Abstract: This paper examines the work done by formulations in the service of pursuing solutions to disputes between neighbours in a community mediation setting. In particular, it shows how mediators formulate the talk of mediation clients – the parties in dispute – in a particular sequence of activities. Parties’ complaints are formulated by the mediator, often proposing common ground between them. Mediators ask ‘solution-focused questions’ (SFQs), which are treated in mediation training as a key method for effecting client-generated solutions to neighbour disputes. Drawing on a collection of 30 recorded mediation sessions between mediators and their clients, conversation analysis shows how formulations do more than (or do not necessarily) ‘summarize’ what clients have said. Rather, they do institutional work of various kinds, including reconstructing clients’ versions of events and initiating sequences in which decisions about change are accomplished. In other words, formulations are at the heart of the mediation process, in which mediators attempt to scaffold clients to come to an agreement about ways to move forward, without giving direct instruction or advice.
Description: This paper was published in the journal Journal of Pragmatics and the definitive published version is available at http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2016.08.006.
Sponsor: The data were collected as part of ESRC grant number RES-148-25-0010 “Identities in neighbour discourse: Community, conflict and exclusion”, held by Elizabeth Stokoe and Derek Edwards.
Version: Accepted for publication
DOI: 10.1016/j.pragma.2016.08.006
URI: https://dspace.lboro.ac.uk/2134/20080
Publisher Link: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2016.08.006
ISSN: 0378-2166
Appears in Collections:Published Articles (Communication, Media, Social and Policy Studies)

Files associated with this item:

File Description SizeFormat
Stokoe Sikveland JoP formulations IR version 2016.pdfAccepted version338.35 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


SFX Query

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.