+44 (0)1509 263171
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
|Title: ||Pregnancy loss in lesbian and bisexual women: an online survey of experiences|
|Authors: ||Peel, Elizabeth|
Lesbian and bisexual women
|Issue Date: ||2010|
|Publisher: ||© The Author. Published by OUP|
|Citation: ||PEEL, E., 2010. Pregnancy loss in lesbian and bisexual women: an online survey of experiences. Human Reproduction, 25(3), pp. 721-727.|
|Abstract: ||background: Although pregnancy loss is a distressing health event for many women, research typically equates women’s experiences of pregnancy loss to ‘married heterosexual women’s experiences of pregnancy loss’. The objective of this study was to explore lesbian and bisexual women’s experiences of miscarriage, stillbirth and neonatal death.
methods: This study analysed predominantly qualitative online survey data from 60 non-heterosexual, mostly lesbian, women from the UK, USA, Canada and Australia. All but one of the pregnancies was planned. Most respondents had physically experienced one early miscarriage during their first pregnancy, although a third had experienced multiple losses.
results: The analysis highlights three themes: processes and practices for conception; amplification of loss; and health care and heterosexism. Of the respondents, 84% conceived using donor sperm; most used various resources to plan conception and engaged in preconception
health care. The experience of loss was amplified due to contextual factors and the investment respondents reported making in
impending motherhood. Most felt that their loss(es) had made a ‘significant’/‘very significant’ impact on their lives. Many respondents experienced health care during their loss. Although the majority rated the overall standard of care as ‘good’/‘very good’/‘outstanding’, a minority reported experiencing heterosexism from health professionals.
conclusions: The implications for policy and practice are outlined. The main limitation was that the inflexibility of the methodology did not allow the specificities of women’s experiences to be probed further. It is suggested that both coupled and single non-heterosexual women should be made more visible in reproductive health and pregnancy loss research.|
|Description: ||This is an Open Access Article. It is published by OUP under the Creative Commons Attribution 2.5 Unported Licence (CC BY-NC). Full details of this licence are available at: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.5/|
|Publisher Link: ||http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/humrep/dep441|
|Appears in Collections:||Published Articles (Communication, Media, Social and Policy Studies)|
Files associated with this item:
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.