Loughborough University
Leicestershire, UK
LE11 3TU
+44 (0)1509 263171
Loughborough University

Loughborough University Institutional Repository

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://dspace.lboro.ac.uk/2134/21118

Title: Climate change and river flooding: part 2 sensitivity characterisation for british catchments and example vulnerability assessments
Authors: Prudhomme, Christel
Kay, Alison L.
Crooks, Sue M.
Reynard, Nick S.
Keywords: Discriminant analysis
Hydrological processes
Response surface
Flood risk
Issue Date: 2013
Publisher: © Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
Citation: PRUDHOMME, C. ... et al, 2013. Climate change and river flooding: part 2 sensitivity characterisation for british catchments and example vulnerability assessments. Climatic Change, 119 (3-4), pp. 949-964
Abstract: This paper is the second of a series describing a scenario-neutral methodology to assess the sensitivity and vulnerability of British catchments to changes in flooding due to climate change. In paper one, nine flood sensitivity types were identified from response surfaces generated for 154 catchments. The response surfaces describe changes in 20-year return period flood peaks (RP20) in response to a large set of changes in precipitation, temperature and potential evapotranspiration. In this paper, a recursive partitioning algorithm is used to link families of sensitivity types to catchment properties, via a decision tree. The tree shows 85 % success characterising the four sensitivity families, using five properties and nine paths. Catchment annual average rainfall is the primary partitioning factor, with drier catchments having a more variable response to climate (precipitation) change than wetter catchments and higher catchment losses and permeability being aggravating factors. The full sensitivity-exposure-vulnerability methodology is illustrated for two catchments: sensitivity is estimated by using the decision tree to identify the sensitivity family (and its associated average response surface); exposure is defined from a set of climate model projections and combined with the response surface to estimate the resulting impacts (changes in RP20); vulnerability under a range of adaptive capacity thresholds is estimated from the set of impacts. Even though they are geographically close, the two catchments show differing vulnerability to climate change, due to their differing properties. This demonstrates that generalised response surfaces characterised by catchment properties are useful screening tools to quantify the vulnerability of catchments to climate change without the need to undertake a full climate change impact study. © 2013 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht.
Description: The final publication is available at Springer via http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10584-013-0726-3
Version: Accepted for publication
DOI: 10.1007/s10584-013-0726-3
URI: https://dspace.lboro.ac.uk/2134/21118
Publisher Link: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10584-013-0726-3
ISSN: 0165-0009
Appears in Collections:Published Articles (Geography)

Files associated with this item:

File Description SizeFormat
RevisionPart2_4Feb2013_CLIM-S-12-00434R1.pdfAccepted version3.59 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


SFX Query

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.