Loughborough University
Leicestershire, UK
LE11 3TU
+44 (0)1509 263171
Loughborough University

Loughborough University Institutional Repository

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://dspace.lboro.ac.uk/2134/21264

Title: Exit velocity: The media election
Authors: Wring, Dominic
Ward, Stephen
Keywords: Social Sciences
Political Science
Government & Law
Issue Date: 2015
Publisher: © The Author 2015. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Hansard Society
Citation: WRING, D. and WARD, S., 2015. Exit Velocity: The Media Election. Parliamentary Affairs, 68(Iss. Suppl. 1), pp. 224-240.
Abstract: The previous campaign of 2010 produced electoral firsts in media terms (the televised leaders' debates), drama and unpredictability (‘Cleggmania’) and memorable moments (Gordon Brown's ‘bigoted woman’ comments) all of which disrupted the parties' planned scripts. Arguably, the 2015 election seems to have been its very antithesis. The plodding six-week campaign has been widely been portrayed as dull, stage-managed, narrowly focused and lacking in surprise moments, but with a dramatic ending on election night, as the broadcasters announced the shock exit poll. The disbelieving former Liberal Democrat leader Paddy Ashdown declared ‘he would eat his hat’ if his party suffered the losses predicted by the forecast; in fact the result was even worse. Ashdown like so many of his fellow commentators, whether of the traditional offline or online media varieties, was stunned by the apparent failure of the opinion polls to foresee the Conservative victory. What followed was the political equivalent of ‘exit velocity’ in the aftermath of a plodding election, with frenetic, intensive debate over the future of the UK sparking the kind of passion lacking in the preceding campaign. The 2015 campaign as reported in the media was predicated on the assumption that the outcome would be another hung Parliament and, possibly, coalition government. This was constantly reinforced by a stream of experts and opinion-formers fixated on what might happen after the election rather what had just happened in the previous Parliament. This augmented the potential power-broking role of emerging ‘challengers’ such as UKIP, the SNP and Greens at the marked expense of the Liberal Democrats, clear beneficiaries of the added exposure they had received in 2010. Yet if the campaign differed in terms of its focus on these growing political parties it was also reminiscent of the previous one with its similar emphasis on polls and other aspects …
Description: This paper is in closed access until Sept 2017.
Version: Accepted for publication
DOI: 10.1093/pa/gsv037
URI: https://dspace.lboro.ac.uk/2134/21264
Publisher Link: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/pa/gsv037
ISSN: 0031-2290
Appears in Collections:Closed Access (Social Sciences)

Files associated with this item:

File Description SizeFormat
Wring_LATEST MEDIA2.pdfAccepted version143.31 kBAdobe PDFView/Open

 

SFX Query

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.