Loughborough University
Leicestershire, UK
LE11 3TU
+44 (0)1509 263171
Loughborough University

Loughborough University Institutional Repository

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://dspace.lboro.ac.uk/2134/21564

Title: Leo Tolstoy’s anticlericalism in its context and beyond: a case against churches and clerics, religious and secular
Authors: Christoyannopoulos, Alexandre J.M.E.
Keywords: Anticlericalism
Christian anarchism
Political theology
Religion and politics
Secular institutions
Issue Date: 2016
Publisher: MDPI / © The Author
Citation: CHRISTOYANNOPOULOS, A., 2016. Leo Tolstoy’s anticlericalism in its context and beyond: a case against churches and clerics, religious and secular. Religions, 7 (5), 59.
Abstract: In the last thirty years of his life, Leo Tolstoy wrote numerous books, essays and pamphlets expounding his newly-articulated views on violence, the state, the church, and on how to improve the human condition. Since then, these “Christian anarchist” views have often been dismissed as utopian or naive, and, despite inspiring many activists and intellectuals, often forgotten or ignored. Some of those views and arguments, however, arguably remain apposite today—and can in some cases be applied to broader phenomena than those he identified. This article focuses on one of the aspects of his Christian anarchist thought: his anticlericalism. The first Section recounts the evolution of Tolstoy’s views on religion and the church, and briefly describes Tolstoy’s peculiar metaphysics. The second outlines his main charges against the church, discusses some common objections to it, and considers the continuing relevance of his anticlericalism. The third seeks to secularise his anticlerical arguments by applying them beyond the church, against secular preachers and institutions, and does so by reflecting on the quality of debate in the contemporary public sphere, on the hypocritical distance between the morality preached by secular “clerics” and their practice, and on the steady process of ossification and betrayal which befalls secular political ideals. The article thus contributes to the literature firstly by summarising, discussing and reflecting upon the anticlericalism of a famous writer who also espoused controversial religious and political views; secondly by succinctly outlining his idiosyncratic metaphysics, including his peculiar reinterpretation of traditional Christian referents; and thirdly by applying the arguments that informed his criticisms of the church to a broader variety of religious and secular secular institutions.
Description: This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY), http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Version: Published
DOI: 10.3390/rel7050059
URI: https://dspace.lboro.ac.uk/2134/21564
Publisher Link: http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/rel7050059
Appears in Collections:Published Articles (PHIR)

Files associated with this item:

File Description SizeFormat
religions-07-00059.pdfPublished version247.79 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


SFX Query

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.