Loughborough University
Leicestershire, UK
LE11 3TU
+44 (0)1509 263171
Loughborough University

Loughborough University Institutional Repository

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://dspace.lboro.ac.uk/2134/21595

Title: In the opponent's shoes: increasing the behavioral validity of attackers' judgments in counterterrorism models
Authors: Bhashyam, Sumitra S.
Montibeller, Gilberto
Keywords: Behavioral validity
Counterterrorism risk analysis
Terrorist decision making
Terrorist judgements
Issue Date: 2016
Publisher: Wiley / © Society for Risk Analysis
Citation: BHASHYAM, S.S. and MONTIBELLER, G., 2016. In the opponent's shoes: increasing the behavioral validity of attackers' judgments in counterterrorism models. Risk Analysis, 36 (4), pp. 666 - 680.
Abstract: A key objective for policymakers and analysts dealing with terrorist threats is trying to predict the actions that malicious agents may take. A recent trend in counterterrorism risk analysis is to model the terrorists' judgments, as these will guide their choices of such actions. The standard assumptions in most of these models are that terrorists are fully rational, following all the normative desiderata required for rational choices, such as having a set of constant and ordered preferences, being able to perform a cost-benefit analysis of their alternatives, among many others. However, are such assumptions reasonable from a behavioral perspective? In this article, we analyze the types of assumptions made across various counterterrorism analytical models that represent malicious agents' judgments and discuss their suitability from a descriptive point of view. We then suggest how some of these assumptions could be modified to describe terrorists' preferences more accurately, by drawing knowledge from the fields of behavioral decision research, politics, philosophy of choice, public choice, and conflict management in terrorism. Such insight, we hope, might help make the assumptions of these models more behaviorally valid for counterterrorism risk analysis.
Description: This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial Licence, CC BY-NC 4.0, http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
Version: Published
DOI: 10.1111/risa.12422
URI: https://dspace.lboro.ac.uk/2134/21595
Publisher Link: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/risa.12422
ISSN: 0272-4332
Appears in Collections:Published Articles (Business School)

Files associated with this item:

File Description SizeFormat
Bhashyam and Montibeller (2015) Increasing the behavioral validity of counterterrorism models.pdfPublished version128.82 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


SFX Query

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.