+44 (0)1509 263171
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
|Title: ||Political theory and history: The case of anarchism|
|Authors: ||Adams, Matthew S.|
Jun, Nathan J.
|Issue Date: ||2015|
|Publisher: ||© Taylor & Francis|
|Citation: ||ADAMS, M.S. and JUN, N.J., 2015. Political theory and history: The case of anarchism. Journal of Political Ideologies, 20(3), pp. 244-262.|
|Abstract: ||This essay critically examines one of the dominant tendencies in recent theoretical discussions of anarchism, postanarchism, and argues that this tradition fails to engage sufficiently with anarchism’s history. Through an examination of late 19th-century anarchist political thought—as represented by one of its foremost exponents, Peter Kropotkin—we demonstrate the extent to which postanarchism has tended to oversimplify and misrepresent the historical tradition of anarchism. The article concludes by arguing that all political-theoretical discussions of anarchism going forward should begin with a fresh appraisal of the actual content of anarchist political thought, based on a rigorous analysis of its political, social, and cultural history.|
|Description: ||This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in Journal of Political Ideologies on 25th November 2015, available online: http://www.tandfonline.com/10.1080/13569317.2015.1075263.|
|Publisher Link: ||http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13569317.2015.1075263|
|Appears in Collections:||Published Articles (PHIR)|
Files associated with this item:
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.