Loughborough University
Leicestershire, UK
LE11 3TU
+44 (0)1509 263171
Loughborough University

Loughborough University Institutional Repository

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://dspace.lboro.ac.uk/2134/22175

Title: Macroinvertebrate diversity in urban and rural ponds: implications for freshwater biodiversity conservation
Authors: Hill, Matthew J.
Ryves, David B.
White, James C.
Wood, Paul J.
Keywords: Conservation value
Landscape scale
Reconciliation ecology
Small lentic waterbodies
Taxonomic richness
Issue Date: 2016
Publisher: © Elsevier
Citation: HILL. M.J. ...et al., 2016. Macroinvertebrate diversity in urban and rural ponds: implications for freshwater biodiversity conservation. Biological Conservation, 201, pp. 50-59.
Abstract: Ponds are among the most biodiverse freshwater ecosystems, yet face significant threats from removal, habitat degradation and a lack of legislative protection globally. Information regarding the habitat quality and biodiversity of ponds across a range of land uses is vital for the long term conservation and management of ecological resources. In this study we examine the biodiversity and conservation value of macroinvertebrates from 91 lowland ponds across 3 land use types (35 floodplain meadow, 15 arable and 41 urban ponds). A total of 224 macroinvertebrate taxa were recorded across all ponds, with urban ponds and floodplain ponds supporting a greater richness than arable ponds at the landscape scale. However, at the alpha scale, urban ponds supported lower faunal diversity (mean: 22 taxa) than floodplain (mean: 32 taxa) or arable ponds (mean: 30 taxa). Floodplain ponds were found to support taxonomically distinct communities compared to arable and urban ponds. A total of 13 macroinvertebrate taxa with a national conservation designation were recorded across the study area and 12 ponds (11 floodplain and 1 arable pond) supported assemblages of high or very high conservation value. Pond conservation currently relies on the designation of individual ponds based on very high biodiversity or the presence of taxa with specific conservation designations. However, this site specific approach fails to acknowledge the contribution of ponds to freshwater biodiversity at the landscape scale. Ponds are highly appropriate sites outside of protected areas (urban/arable), with which the general public are already familiar, for local and landscape scale conservation of freshwater habitats.
Description: This paper was published in the journal Biological Conservation and the definitive published version is available at http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2016.06.027.
Version: Accepted for publication
DOI: 10.1016/j.biocon.2016.06.027
URI: https://dspace.lboro.ac.uk/2134/22175
Publisher Link: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2016.06.027
ISSN: 1873-2917
Appears in Collections:Published Articles (Geography and Environment)

Files associated with this item:

File Description SizeFormat
Wood_Hill et al - BIOC-D-16-00140 - final.pdfAccepted version586.34 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


SFX Query

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.