Loughborough University
Leicestershire, UK
LE11 3TU
+44 (0)1509 263171
Loughborough University

Loughborough University Institutional Repository

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://dspace.lboro.ac.uk/2134/22861

Title: Open-access mega-journals: The future of scholarly communication or academic dumping ground? A review
Authors: Spezi, Valerie C.L.
Wakeling, Simon
Pinfield, Stephen
Creaser, Claire
Fry, Jenny
Willett, Peter
Keywords: Open access
Scholarly communication
Scholarly publishing
Research dissemination
Peer review
Article-processing charges
Issue Date: 2017
Publisher: Emerald Publishing Limited © Valerie Spezi, Simon Wakeling, Stephen Pinfield, Claire Creaser, Jenny Fry, Peter Willett.
Citation: SPEZI, V. ...et al., 2017. Open-access mega-journals: The future of scholarly communication or academic dumping ground? A review. Journal of Documentation, 73 (2), pp.263 - 283.
Abstract: Purpose: Open-access mega-journals (OAMJs) represent an increasingly important part of the scholarly communication landscape. OAMJs, such as PLOS ONE, are large scale, broad scope journals that operate an open access business model (normally based on article-processing charges), and which employ a novel form of peer review, focusing on scientific ‘soundness’ and eschewing judgment of novelty or importance. This paper examines the discourses relating to OAMJs, and their place within scholarly publishing, and considers attitudes towards mega-journals within the academic community. Design/methodology/approach: This paper presents a review of the literature of OAMJs structured around four defining characteristics: scale, disciplinary scope, peer review policy and economic model. The existing scholarly literature was augmented by searches of more informal outputs, such as blogs and email discussion lists, to capture the debate in its entirety. Findings: While the academic literature relating specifically to OAMJs is relatively sparse, discussion in other fora is detailed and animated, with debates ranging from the sustainability and ethics of the mega-journal model, to the impact of soundness-only peer review on article quality and discoverability, and the potential for OAMJs to represent a paradigm-shifting development in scholarly publishing. Originality/value: This article represents the first comprehensive review of the mega-journal phenomenon, drawing not only on the published academic literature, but also grey, professional and informal sources. The paper advances a number of ways in which the role of OAMJs in the scholarly communication environment can be conceptualised.
Description: This paper is published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 3.0) licence. Anyone may reproduce, distribute, translate and create derivative works of this article (for both commercial and non-commercial purposes), subject to full attribution to the original publication and authors. The full terms of this licence may be seen at: http://creativecommons.org/licences/by/3.0/legalcode
Sponsor: This paper was produced as part of the Open-Access Mega-Journals and the Future of Scholarly Communication project funded by the UK Arts and Humanities Research Council (AHRC), AH/M010643/1.
Version: Published
URI: https://dspace.lboro.ac.uk/2134/22861
Publisher Link: http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/JD-06-2016-0082
ISSN: 1758-7379
Appears in Collections:Published Articles (Business)
Published Articles (English and Drama)

Files associated with this item:

File Description SizeFormat
JD-06-2016-0082.pdfPublished version349.35 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


SFX Query

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.