Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
|Title: ||Open-access mega-journals: The future of scholarly communication or academic dumping ground? A review|
|Authors: ||Spezi, Valerie|
|Keywords: ||Open access|
|Issue Date: ||2016|
|Publisher: ||© Emerald|
|Citation: ||SPEZI, V. ...et al., 2016. Open-access mega-journals: The future of scholarly communication or academic dumping ground? A review. Journal of Documentation, In press.|
|Abstract: ||Purpose: Open-access mega-journals (OAMJs) represent an increasingly important part of the scholarly communication landscape. OAMJs, such as PLOS ONE, are large scale, broad scope journals that operate an open access business model (normally based on article-processing charges), and which employ a novel form of peer review, focusing on scientific ‘soundness’ and eschewing judgment of novelty or importance. This paper examines the discourses relating to OAMJs, and their place within scholarly publishing, and considers attitudes towards mega-journals within the academic community.
Design/methodology/approach: This paper presents a review of the literature of OAMJs structured around four defining characteristics: scale, disciplinary scope, peer review policy and economic model. The existing scholarly literature was augmented by searches of more informal outputs, such as blogs and email discussion lists, to capture the debate in its entirety.
Findings: While the academic literature relating specifically to OAMJs is relatively sparse, discussion in other fora is detailed and animated, with debates ranging from the sustainability and ethics of the mega-journal model, to the impact of soundness-only peer review on article quality and discoverability, and the potential for OAMJs to represent a paradigm-shifting development in scholarly publishing.
Originality/value: This article represents the first comprehensive review of the mega-journal phenomenon, drawing not only on the published academic literature, but also grey, professional and informal sources. The paper advances a number of ways in which the role of OAMJs in the scholarly communication environment can be conceptualised.|
|Description: ||This paper is in closed access until it is published.|
|Sponsor: ||This paper was produced as part of the Open-Access Mega-Journals and the Future of Scholarly Communication project funded by the UK Arts and Humanities Research Council (AHRC), AH/M010643/1.|
|Version: ||Accepted for publication|
|Publisher Link: ||http://www.emeraldinsight.com/loi/jd|
|Appears in Collections:||Closed Access (Business School)|
Files associated with this item:
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.