Loughborough University
Leicestershire, UK
LE11 3TU
+44 (0)1509 263171
Loughborough University

Loughborough University Institutional Repository

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://dspace.lboro.ac.uk/2134/22936

Title: Imperial borderland? Fear and rivalry in representations in print of the landscape of Carolina and Louisiana 1660-1753
Authors: Armstrong, Catherine M.
Keywords: Borderlands
Imperial
Carolina
British
French
Exploration
Landscape
Issue Date: 2016
Publisher: © The Authors. Published by Laboratoire d’Etudes et de Recherches sur le Monde Anglophone (LERMA)
Citation: ARMSTRONG, C.M., 2016. Imperial Borderland? Fear and Rivalry in representations in print of the landscape of Carolina and Louisiana 1660-1753. E-rea : Revue Électronique d’Études sur le Monde Anglophone, 14 (1), 15 décembre 2016, consulté le 18 janvier 2017. URL : http://erea.revues.org/5197 ; DOI : 10.4000/erea.5197
Abstract: For the first half-century of settlement by Europeans, the colonies of Carolina and Louisiana were imperial borderlands. Looking west, Carolinians were among the first settlers to highlight and experience the threat that the French posed once they had traversed and mapped the length of the Mississippi. Although during this period the efforts to claim, survey and document landownership were flourishing, the reality of struggling to clear and use tracts of many hundreds of acres meant that much of the region remained ‘wilderness’ despite being nominally owned by Europeans. This paper compares British and French printed accounts that symbolically brought this land under control. I argue that European efforts to bring the landscape, flora and fauna of the southeast under control were problematic even in areas not previously understood as ‘borderlands’, such as parts of Charles Town and New Orleans themselves. While the accounts do reflect a feeling of increasing imperial confidence on the part of the British and the French, during this period neither was able to fully control the landscape they professed to have mastered. This paper shows that it was the vulnerability, not the strength, of these powers that struck the authors whose work is surveyed here.
Description: This is an Open Access Article. It is published by Laboratoire d’Etudes et de Recherches sur le Monde Anglophone (LERMA) under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives Licence (CC BY-NC-ND). Full details of this licence are available at: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
Version: Accepted for publication
DOI: 10.4000/erea.5197
URI: https://dspace.lboro.ac.uk/2134/22936
Publisher Link: http://dx.doi.org/10.4000/erea.5197
ISSN: 1638-1718
Appears in Collections:Published Articles (PHIR)

Files associated with this item:

File Description SizeFormat
Armstrong E-rea article.pdfAccepted version58.87 kBAdobe PDFView/Open

 

SFX Query

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.