Loughborough University
Leicestershire, UK
LE11 3TU
+44 (0)1509 263171
Loughborough University

Loughborough University Institutional Repository

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://dspace.lboro.ac.uk/2134/23108

Title: Bystander intervention intention to negative acts at work: the role of mode, type, organisational action and relationship to target
Authors: Coyne, Iain J.
Gopaul, Alana-Marie
Campbell, Marilyn
Pankasz, Alexandra
Garland, Robyn
Cousins, Frances
Keywords: Bystanders
Cyberbullying
Negative acts
Policy
Workplace bullying
Issue Date: 2016
Publisher: Springer
Citation: COYNE, I.J. ... et al, 2016. Bystander intervention intention to negative acts at work: the role of mode, type, organisational action and relationship to target. Journal of Business Ethics, In Review.
Abstract: The current paper examines bystanders’ intervention intention to workplace negative acts across three studies based on international employee samples (N=766). Using a vignettebased design, we examined the role of bullying mode (offline vs. online), bullying type (personal vs. work-related), organisational action (presence/absence of bullying policy) and target closeness (friend vs. work colleague) on bystanders’ behavioural intentions to respond, to sympathise with the victim (defender role), to reinforce the perpetrator (prosecutor role) and to be ambivalent (commuter role). Results illustrated a pattern of the influence of mode and type on bystander intentions. Bystanders were least likely to support the victim and more likely to agree with perpetrator actions for cyberbullying and work-related acts. Tentatively, support emerged for the effect of target closeness on bystander intentions. Although effect sizes were small, when the target was a friend, bystanders tended to be more likely to act and defend the victim and less likely to reinforce the perpetrator. No significant main effects or interactions emerged for organisational action of providing a bullying policy. Implications for research and the potential for bystander education are discussed.
Description: This paper is embargoed until twelve months after publication.
Version: Submitted for publication
URI: https://dspace.lboro.ac.uk/2134/23108
Publisher Link: http://www.springer.com/social+sciences/applied+ethics/journal/10551
ISSN: 0167-4544
Appears in Collections:Closed Access (Business School)

Files associated with this item:

File Description SizeFormat
BUSI-S-16-02050 paper submission.pdfSubmitted version3.1 MBAdobe PDFView/Open

 

SFX Query

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.