Loughborough University
Leicestershire, UK
LE11 3TU
+44 (0)1509 263171
Loughborough University

Loughborough University Institutional Repository

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://dspace.lboro.ac.uk/2134/23585

Title: Bridging the divide between upward accountability and learning-based approaches to development evaluation: strategies for an enabling environment
Authors: Lennie, June
Tacchi, Jo
Keywords: Development economics
Communication in economic development
Issue Date: 2014
Publisher: Australasian Evaluation Society
Citation: LENNIE, J. and TACCHI, J., 2014. Bridging the divide between upward accountability and learning-based approaches to development evaluation: strategies for an enabling environment. Evaluation Journal of Australasia, 14 (1), pp. 12-23.
Abstract: A more complex and unstable development context and major shifts in development theory and practice over the past 20 years have created major challenges for evaluation. There remains a vast gap between the theory and practice of development evaluation that needs to be resolved. This indicates a vital need to bridge the divide between dominant results-based, upward accountability evaluation approaches and emergent learning, participatory and complexity-based approaches to more effectively achieve development goals. In this article we explore this divide and contrast these approaches, highlighting some of the key challenges that each face. Drawing on our recent research, we identify key challenges, tensions and contradictions in evaluating communication for development (C4D) that need to be better understood and addressed. We outline a new conceptual framework for evaluating C4D and other complex development initiatives as a strategy to address these challenges. We argue that achieving change requires reconceptualising accountability and learning, developing evaluation capacities that enable learning and multiple forms of accountability, and drawing on local knowledge, ideas and innovation to develop and implement more appropriate and effective evaluation approaches. These strategies can create an enabling environment in which these new ideas and approaches can flourish and complex development issues can be better addressed.
Description: This paper was accepted for publication in the journal Evaluation Journal of Australasia and appears here with the kind permission of the publisher. The definitive published version is available at http://search.informit.com.au/documentSummary;dn=513236376941726;res=IELBUS.
Sponsor: Australian Research Council and Equal Access
Version: Accepted for publication
URI: https://dspace.lboro.ac.uk/2134/23585
Publisher Link: http://search.informit.com.au/documentSummary;dn=513236376941726;res=IELBUS
ISSN: 1035-719X
Appears in Collections:Published Articles (Loughborough University London)

Files associated with this item:

File Description SizeFormat
Bridging the Divide accepted 2014.pdfAccepted version414.05 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


SFX Query

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.