Loughborough University
Leicestershire, UK
LE11 3TU
+44 (0)1509 263171
Loughborough University

Loughborough University Institutional Repository

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://dspace.lboro.ac.uk/2134/23903

Title: Stopping incidents in their tracks: identifying weak signals for error prevention in healthcare
Authors: Burford, Eva-Maria
Fray, Mike
Waterson, Patrick
Keywords: Weak signals
Errors
Patient handling
Patient discharge
Issue Date: 2016
Publisher: © The Healthcare Systems Ergonomics and Patient Safety Conference (HEPS 2016)
Citation: BURFORD, E.-M., FRAY, M. and WATERSON, P., 2016. Stopping incidents in their tracks: identifying weak signals for error prevention in healthcare. Presented at Healthcare and Society: New Challenges, New Opportunities. International Conference on Healthcare Systems Ergonomics and Patient Safety (HEPS 2016), Toulouse, France, 5th-7th October 2016, pp. 61-67.
Abstract: In order to adjust performance to ensure the success of a task and prevent error, it is necessary to anticipate, identify and respond to signals indicating changes in the system. The objectives of this study were to investigate weak signals within two different healthcare case studies by identifying key elements and behaviours of these tasks. This study investigated both Safety-I and Safety-II elements with four expert groups, two from the field of patient handling and two from the field of patient discharge. The Safety-I and Safety-II elements explored included potential errors, influencing factors, weak signals and learning opportunities arising from the investigated situations. The errors identified by the focus groups were related to skill, knowledge, inappropriate equipment, equipment misuse, lack of communication, missing or incomplete information, incorrect technique, and preconditions not being fulfilled. The influencing factors identified by the two case studies included patient-related factors, time and space-related factors as well as organizational and managerial factors such as available resources and safety culture. The weak signals identified in both case studies were analysed using the SEIPS 2.0 model. The sources of the signals were identified as originating from the work system elements “person”, “tasks”, “organization” and “internal environment”. The manifestation forms of the weak signals included the different sensory signals as well as the experience of intuition or “hunches”. Potential learning opportunities to improve signal recognition were identified and included the need for reflection and empowerment, continuous assessment and the sharing of information between the involved systems. The proposed framework and method provide a preliminary basis for the investigation of weak signals and assists in highlighting the role that the weak signals can play in safety behaviour.
Description: This is a conference paper.
Version: Accepted for publication
URI: https://dspace.lboro.ac.uk/2134/23903
Publisher Link: http://heps2016.org/
Appears in Collections:Conference Papers and Presentations (Design School)

Files associated with this item:

File Description SizeFormat
HEPS2016_Communication_Paper_Burford.pdfAccepted version210.66 kBAdobe PDFView/Open

 

SFX Query

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.