Loughborough University
Leicestershire, UK
LE11 3TU
+44 (0)1509 263171
Loughborough University

Loughborough University Institutional Repository

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://dspace.lboro.ac.uk/2134/24199

Title: Occupational safety and health considerations of returning to work after cancer
Authors: Crawford, Joanne O.
Davis, Alice
Sleeuwenhoek, Anne
Dixon, Ken
McElvenny, Damien
Munir, Fehmidah
McDermott, Hilary
Donaldson-Feilder, Emma
Keywords: Cancer
Return to work
Issue Date: 2017
Publisher: © Institution of Occupational Safety and Health (IOSH)
Citation: CRAWFORD, J.O. ...et al., 2017. Occupational safety and health considerations of returning to work after cancer: Report submitted to the IOSH Research Committee. Leicester: IOSH, 195 pp.
Abstract: Increasing numbers of people undergo a return to work (RTW) after a cancer diagnosis and treatment. Although there is evidence available in relation to managing the RTW process, at the current time, there is limited information available in relation to any safety and health issues associated with this process. Using a systematic review and organisational case studies, this project aimed to understand the health and safety implications of returning to work or staying in work during treatment, to identify what employers can do to facilitate this process for cancer survivors and to develop guidance for IOSH from the work carried out. The systematic review identified that understanding the potential changes in individual capacity (both physical and mental) are essential, as are the role of the line manager, being able to offer flexibility in returning to work, and understanding that the process can be long term. The case studies aimed to identify good practice and found that different aspects can impact on the RTW or continuation to work, including using risk assessments of work tasks rather than job roles, and considering the impact of physical and psychological demands. Different factors need to be considered within the risk assessment, including the impact of fatigue, risks of infection, work planning and breaks in the working day, the inclusion of emergency planning, and flexibility in start times or workplace. The work has also highlighted a number of evidence gaps, including: the lack of an evidence base for safety, health or ergonomic interventions; a lack of information in relation to manual workers and their RTW needs; a lack of information on those who have had to change jobs or on their future employability; and a need for more in-depth, longer-term research. Content for an IOSH OH Toolkit on RTW after cancer was also produced as part of this work.
Description: This research is funded by IOSH and is reproduced here by their kind permission.
Sponsor: This research was funded by IOSH.
Version: Published
URI: https://dspace.lboro.ac.uk/2134/24199
Publisher Link: https://www.iosh.co.uk/Books-and-resources/Return-to-work-after-Cancer.aspx
Appears in Collections:Official Reports (Sport, Exercise and Health Sciences)

Files associated with this item:

File Description SizeFormat
Return to Work after Cancer Full Report.pdfPublished version2.68 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


SFX Query

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.