Loughborough University
Leicestershire, UK
LE11 3TU
+44 (0)1509 263171
Loughborough University

Loughborough University Institutional Repository

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://dspace.lboro.ac.uk/2134/24477

Title: Comparative approaches to gentrification: lessons from the rural
Authors: Phillips, Martin
Smith, Darren P.
Keywords: Comparative urbanism
France
Rural gentrification
United Kingdom
United States
Urban gentrification
Issue Date: 2018
Publisher: © The Authors. Published by SAGE Publications (UK and US)
Citation: PHILLIPS, M. and SMITH, D.P., 2018. Comparative approaches to gentrification: lessons from the rural. Dialogues in Human Geography, 8(1), pp. 3–25.
Abstract: The epistemologies and politics of comparative research are prominently debated within urban studies, with ‘comparative urbanism’ emerging as a contemporary lexicon of urban studies. The study of urban gentrification has, after some delay, come to engage with these debates, which can be seen to pose a major challenge to the very concept of gentrification. To date, similar debates or developments have not unfolded within the study of rural gentrification. This article seeks to address some of the challenges posed to gentrification studies through an examination of strategies of comparison and how they might be employed within a comparative study of rural gentrification. Drawing on Tilly (Big structures Large Processes Huge Comparisons. New York: Russell Sage), examples of four ‘strategies of comparison’ are identified within studies of urban and rural gentrification, before the paper explores how ‘geographies of the concept’ and ‘geographies of the phenomenon’ of rural gentrification in the United Kingdom, United States and France may be investigated using Latour’s (Pandora’s Hope. London: Harvard University Press) notion of ‘circulatory sociologies of translation’. The aim of our comparative discussion is to open up dialogues on the challenges of comparative studies that employ conceptions of gentrification and also to promote reflections of the metrocentricity of recent discussions of comparative research.
Description: This paper was accepted for publication in the journal Dialogues in Human Geography and the definitive published version is available at https://doi.org/10.1177/2043820617752009
Version: Accepted for publication
DOI: 10.1177/2043820617752009
URI: https://dspace.lboro.ac.uk/2134/24477
Publisher Link: https://doi.org/10.1177/2043820617752009
ISSN: 2043-8214
Appears in Collections:Published Articles (Geography and Environment)

Files associated with this item:

File Description SizeFormat
Dialogues_Phillips_Smith.pdfAccepted version347.67 kBAdobe PDFView/Open

 

SFX Query

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.