+44 (0)1509 263171
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
|Title: ||UK construction safety: a zero paradox?|
|Authors: ||Sherratt, F.|
Dainty, Andrew R.J.
|Keywords: ||Construction industry|
|Issue Date: ||2017|
|Publisher: ||© Taylor & Francis|
|Citation: ||SHERRATT, F. and DAINTY, A.R.J., 2017. UK construction safety: a zero paradox? Policy and Practice in Health and Safety, 15 (2), pp. 108-116.|
|Abstract: ||The zero accident mantra has become embedded within the safety discourse of large UK construction organisations. A critique has emerged around this phenomenon and its alignment with outmoded ‘Safety I’ thinking, a consequence of the dominant focus on accident causality. But the extent to which zero-focused approaches yield reductions in accident frequency is yet to be empirically investigated. By way of an evidence-based critique, we examine the relationship between major accidents and zero approaches by drawing on Health and Safety Executive accident data over a 4 year period, together with an analysis of major contractors’ safety approaches. This reveals that working on a project subject to a zero safety policy or programme actually appears to slightly increase the likelihood of having a serious life-changing accident or fatality; a possible ‘zero paradox’. Although these findings should be treated with caution, they suggest that the apparent trend towards abandoning zero amongst some large organisations is well-founded. More pointedly, if zero policies are closing down opportunities to learn and innovate while simultaneously failing to yield reductions in serious accident rates, then this suggests a need to discard this discourse in favour of more contingent perspectives on safe working.|
|Description: ||This paper is in closed access until 22nd March 2018.|
|Version: ||Accepted for publication|
|Publisher Link: ||http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14773996.2017.1305040|
|Appears in Collections:||Closed Access (Architecture, Building and Civil Engineering)|
Files associated with this item:
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.