Loughborough University
Leicestershire, UK
LE11 3TU
+44 (0)1509 263171
Loughborough University

Loughborough University Institutional Repository

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://dspace.lboro.ac.uk/2134/24615

Title: Matters of grave importance: style in Norman Mailer's 'The Executioner's Song'
Authors: Jarvis, Brian
Keywords: Execution
Style
Norman Mailer
Gary Gilmore
Issue Date: 2017
Publisher: Modern Humanities Research Association
Citation: JARVIS, B., 2017. Matters of grave importance: style in Norman Mailer's 'The Executioner's Song'. IN: Christ, B. and Morisi, E. (eds.) Death Sentences: Literary Language and State Killing. Cambridge: MHRA, Legenda, pp. 102-133.
Series/Report no.: Studies In Comparative Literature;49
Abstract: in lieu... the opening paragraph. Matters of grave importance: style in Norman Mailer’s The Executioner’s Song …to send my style through a circus of variations and postures, a fireworks of virtuosity… a quick-change artist, as if I can trap the Prince of Truth in the act of switching style. Norman Mailer, Advertisements for Myself At 8:07a.m on January 17th 1977, Gary Mark Gilmore was executed just outside the grounds of Utah State Prison. Less than six months earlier, on the morning of July 21st 1976, Gilmore had been arrested on the outskirts of Provo in Utah on suspicion of armed robbery and double homicide. Gilmore’s victims were Max Jensen, a gas station attendant in Orem and Ben Bushnell, a motel manager in Provo. In both incidents, Gilmore instructed his compliant victim to lie face down on the floor before shooting them in the head. The subsequent trial commenced on October 5th and was concluded in two days. Gilmore was convicted and sentenced to death. Given the opportunity to choose the mode of his execution, the condemned man elected to be shot by a firing squad. The date of the execution was set for 15th November 1976, but when Gilmore waived his right to appeal the American Civil Liberties Union and the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People attempted to intervene. There had been a de facto moratorium on the death penalty in the U.S for around a decade and opponents of capital punishment were deeply concerned that this might be overturned by the precedent of the Gilmore case. A number of judicial stays were issued right up to the eve of the execution when the legitimacy of Gilmore’s punishment was authoritatively determined by a Supreme Court ruling based on a majority of five to four. Five local police officers were recruited as executioners. With no recent experience of carrying out capital punishment, prison officials converted a space in a nearby disused cannery into a bespoke execution facility. The marksmen were positioned behind a makeshift curtain with small holes cut out through which to shoot. Their target was hooded and strapped to an office chair positioned in front of a dirty mattress and some sandbags. Asked for any last words, Gilmore responded bluntly: ‘Let’s do it’. Allegedly, this infamous phrase inspired the Nike slogan: ‘Just do it’. This may be the most conspicuous legacy of the Gilmore execution, but it is not the most momentous. As opponents of the death penalty feared, by insisting on his inalienable right to die, Gilmore re-opened the door to the death chamber in the U.S. Inadvertently, ‘let’s do it’ issued an imperative to the killing state which since 1977 has carried out over 1,400 legal homicides.
Description: This book chapter is in closed access until 12 months after publication.
Version: Submitted for publication
URI: https://dspace.lboro.ac.uk/2134/24615
Publisher Link: http://www.mhra.org.uk/publications/Death-Sentences
ISBN: 9781781885574
9781781885581
Appears in Collections:Closed Access (English and Drama)

Files associated with this item:

File Description SizeFormat
Jarvis_Mailer essay.pdfSubmitted version176.66 kBAdobe PDFView/Open

 

SFX Query

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.