Loughborough University
Leicestershire, UK
LE11 3TU
+44 (0)1509 263171
Loughborough University

Loughborough University Institutional Repository

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://dspace.lboro.ac.uk/2134/24909

Title: Personal activity centres and geosocial data analysis: Combining big data with small data
Authors: Robertson, Colin
Feick, Rob
Sykora, Martin D.
Shankardass, Ketan
Shaughnessy, Krystelle
Keywords: Geosocial
Personal activity centres
Clustering
Spatial analysis
Issue Date: 2017
Publisher: © Springer International Publishing
Citation: ROBERTSON, C. ... et al, 2017. Personal activity centres and geosocial data analysis: Combining big data with small data. IN: Bregt, A. ... et al (eds). Societal Geo-innovation: Selected papers of the 20th AGILE conference on Geographic Information Science, AGILE 2017, Wageningen, Netherlands, 9-12 May 2017, pp. 145-161.
Abstract: Understanding how people move and interact within urban settings has been greatly facilitated by the expansion of personal computing and mobile studies. Geosocial data derived from social media applications have the potential to both document how large segments of urban populations move about and use space, as well as how they interact with their environments. In this paper we examine spatial and temporal clustering of individuals’ geosocial messages as a way to derive personal activity centres for a subset of Twitter users in the City of Toronto. We compare the two types of clustering, and for a subset of users, compare to actual self-reported activity centres. Our analysis reveals that home locations were detected within 500 m for up to 53% of users using simple spatial clustering methods based on a sample of 16 users. Work locations were detected within 500 m for 33% of users. Additionally, we find that the broader pattern of geosocial footprints indicated that 35% of users have only one activity centre, 30% have two activity centres, and 14% have three activity centres. Tweets about environment were more likely sent from locations other than work and home, and when not directed to another user. These findings indicate activity centres defined from Twitter do relate to general spatial activities, but the limited degree of spatial variability on an individual level limits the applications of geosocial footprints for more detailed analyses of movement patterns in the city.
Description: This paper is closed access until 5th April 2018. This is a pre-copyedited version of a contribution published in Bregt A., Sarjakoski T., van Lammeren R., Rip F. (eds) Societal Geo-innovation: Selected papers of the 20th AGILE conference on Geographic Information Science published by Springer International Publishing. The definitive authenticated version is available online via http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-56759-4_9.
Sponsor: Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada
Version: Accepted for publication
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-56759-4_9
URI: https://dspace.lboro.ac.uk/2134/24909
Publisher Link: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-56759-4_9
ISBN: 9783319567594
9783319567587
Appears in Collections:Closed Access (Business School)

Files associated with this item:

File Description SizeFormat
PersonalActivityCentres-agilePacs-Feb 10-17.pdfAccepted version5.79 MBAdobe PDFView/Open

 

SFX Query

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.