+44 (0)1509 263171
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
|Title: ||A critical argument in favour of theoretical pluralism: project failure and the many and varied limitations of project management|
|Authors: ||Sage, Daniel J.|
Dainty, Andrew R.J.
|Keywords: ||Project failure|
Critical project studies
|Issue Date: ||2014|
|Publisher: ||© Elsevier, APM and IPMA|
|Citation: ||SAGE, D., DAINTY, A. and BROOKES, N., 2014. A critical argument in favor of theoretical pluralism: project failure and the many and varied limitations of project management. International Journal of Project Management, 32 (4), pp.544-555.|
|Abstract: ||In project management, failure is often assumed to be evidence of deficient management: a problem that can be overcome by better management. Drawing on qualitative research within UK construction projects we examine how four different theoretical approaches (positivism, structural Marxism, interpretivism and actor–network theory) all challenge this managerial assumption. Each theoretical perspective enables a specific analysis of empirical data that critiques the notion that project failures are easily, simply, or largely, associated with the failure of project management. In so doing, our pluralist analysis reveals the social and political contextualization of performance in project management. We thus conclude by proposing that practitioner and scholarly concerns with project failure (and success), can actively contribute to attempts to reflect upon various matters of political concern as developed within the Making Projects Critical community, and by extension Critical Management Studies. Thus, we propose greater interaction between critical and mainstream project research communities.|
|Version: ||Accepted for publication|
|Publisher Link: ||http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2013.08.005|
|Appears in Collections:||Published Articles (Business School)|
Files associated with this item:
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.