+44 (0)1509 263171
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
|Title: ||The provision of medical care in English professional football: an update|
|Authors: ||Malcolm, Dominic|
|Issue Date: ||2017|
|Publisher: ||Elsevier © Sports Medicine Australia|
|Citation: ||MALCOLM, D., SCOTT, A. and WADDINGTON, I., 2017. The provision of medical care in English professional football: an update. Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport, 20(12), pp. 1053-1056.|
|Abstract: ||Objectives: To compare the current methods of appointment, qualifications and occupational experience of club doctors and physiotherapists in English professional football with (i) those outlined in a study published in 1999, and (ii) Football Association (FA) medical regulations. Design: Qualitative. Methods: Postal questionnaire survey of (head) doctors and physiotherapists at each of the clubs in the English Premiership, Championship and Football Leagues 1 and 2. Response rates of 35.8% and 45.6% respectively were obtained. Results: The majority offootball club doctors are GPs who have sports medicine qualifications and relevant
occupational experience. Time commitments vary from full time to a few hours per week. Most are appointed through personal contacts rather than job advertisements and/or interview. Almost all football
clubs have a chartered physiotherapist, many of whom have a postgraduate qualification. They work full
time and long hours. Most are appointed through personal contacts rather than job advertisements. They
are frequently interviewed but not always by someone qualified to judge their professional expertise.
Conclusions: Football club medical provision has become more extensive and increasingly professional
over the last 10–20 years, with better qualified, more career-oriented and more formally contracted staff.
It is likely that clinical autonomy has subsequently increased. However recruitment procedures still need
to be improved, especially in relation to advertising vacancies, interviewing candidates, and including
medical personnel on interview panels. In two aspects clubs appear not to be compliant with current FA
|Description: ||This paper is closed access until 25th May 2018.|
|Version: ||Accepted for publication|
|Publisher Link: ||http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jsams.2017.05.004|
|Appears in Collections:||Closed Access (Sport, Exercise and Health Sciences)|
Files associated with this item:
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.