Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
|Title: ||The addition of a tension night splint to a structured home rehabilitation programme in patients with chronic plantar fasciitis does not lead to significant additional benefits in either pain, function or flexibility: a single-blinded randomised controlled trial|
|Authors: ||Wheeler, Patrick C.|
|Issue Date: ||2017|
|Publisher: ||BMJ © Article author|
|Citation: ||WHEELER, P.C., 2017. The addition of a tension night splint to a structured home rehabilitation programme in patients with chronic plantar fasciitis does not lead to significant additional benefits in either pain, function or flexibility: a single-blinded randomised controlled trial. BMJ Open Sport & Exercise Medicine, 3 (1), e000234.|
|Abstract: ||Objective To identify any improvements in pain or function in patients with chronic plantar fasciitis following the use of a tension night splint (TNS). Methods Single-blinded randomised controlled trial, with participants split evenly between intervention group (TNS + home exercise programme/HEP) and control group (HEP only). Follow-up at 3 months, with interim data at 6 weeks. Results 40 patients recruited. Mean age 52.1 years, 33% male, mean body mass index 30.8 kg/m2, mean duration of symptoms of 25 months. Improvement in self-reported ‘average pain’ in the intervention group from 6.8/10 at baseline to 5.6/10 at 6 weeks, and 5.3/10 at 3 months (both clinically and statistically significant at both time points), compared with control group of 7.1/10 at baseline to 6.2/10 at 6 weeks and 5.6/10 at 3 months (significant only at 3 months).
Improvements in self-reported ‘worst pain’, ‘pain walking’ and ‘pain first thing in the morning’ in both groups at all time periods. Improvements were seen in revised Foot Function Index at all time points in both groups, but limited changes seen in flexibility and no significant changes in anxiety or depression Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale domains or sleep quality in either group. However, no differences were seen between the outcomes seen in the two groups for the majority of the measures studied.
Conclusions Improvements in pain and some functional measures seen in both groups, with few, if any, differences seen in outcomes between the intervention group compared with the control group. However, ongoing pain symptoms were reported in both groups, suggesting that ‘help’ rather than ‘cure’ was obtained for the majority. There is a possibility of earlier benefit seen in the intervention group compared
with the control group, but data are unclear and further
work may be needed.|
|Description: ||This is an Open Access Article. It is published by BMJ under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International Licence (CC BY-NC 4.0). Full details of this licence are available at: http://
|Sponsor: ||The author would like to offer his thanks to the Leicester Arthritis Research Fund for the small charitable grant that allowed the purchase of the tension night splint devices.|
|Publisher Link: ||http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjsem-2017-000234|
|Appears in Collections:||Published Articles (Sport, Exercise and Health Sciences)|
Files associated with this item:
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.