+44 (0)1509 263171
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
|Title: ||Do changes in neuromuscular activation contribute to the knee extensor angle-torque relationship?|
|Authors: ||Lanza, Marcel B.|
Balshaw, Thomas G.
Folland, Jonathan P.
|Keywords: ||Knee joint angle|
Interpolated twitch technique
|Issue Date: ||2017|
|Publisher: ||Wiley © The Authors. Experimental Physiology © The Physiological Society|
|Citation: ||LANZA, M.B., BALSHAW, T.G. and FOLLAND, J.P., 2017. Do changes in neuromuscular activation contribute to the knee extensor angle-torque relationship? Experimental Physiology, 102 (8), pp. 962–973.|
|Abstract: ||The influence of joint angle on knee extensor neuromuscular activation is unclear due in part due to the diversity of surface electromyography (sEMG) and/or interpolated twitch technique (ITT) methods employed. The aim of the study was to compare neuromuscular activation, using rigorous contemporary sEMG and ITT procedures, during isometric maximal voluntary contractions (iMVC) of the quadriceps femoris (Q) at different knee-joint angles and examine if activation contributes to the angle-torque relationship. Sixteen healthy active males completed two familiarization sessions and two experimental sessions of isometric knee extension and knee flexion contractions. The experimental sessions included the following at each of four joint angles (25°, 50°, 80° and 106°): iMVCs (with and without superimposed evoked doublets); submaximal contractions with superimposed doublets; evoked twitch and doublet contractions whilst voluntarily passive and knee flexion iMVC at the same knee joint positions. Absolute Q EMG was normalised to MMAX peak-to-peak amplitude and the doublet-voluntary torque relationship was used to calculate activation with the ITT (ACTITT ). Agonist activation, assessed with both normalised EMG and ACTITT , was reduced in the more extended compared to the more flexed positions (25 & 50 vs. 80 & 106°; P ≤ 0.016), whereas antagonist co-activation was greatest in the most flexed compared to the extended positions (106 vs. 25 & 50°; P ≤ 0.02). In conclusion, both agonist and antagonist activation differed with knee joint angle during knee extension iMVCs and thus both likely contribute to the knee extensor angle-torque relationship.|
|Description: ||This paper is closed access until 12th July 2018.|
|Sponsor: ||M.B.L. was supported by the Coordenacao de Aperfeicoamentode Pessoal de Nivel Superior (CAPES).|
|Version: ||Accepted for publication|
|Publisher Link: ||http://dx.doi.org/10.1113/EP086343|
|Appears in Collections:||Closed Access (Sport, Exercise and Health Sciences)|
Files associated with this item:
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.