+44 (0)1509 263171
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
|Title: ||Rapid prototyping of geosynthetic interfaces: Investigation of peak strength using direct shear tests|
|Authors: ||Fowmes, Gary John|
Zaharescu, Catalin A.
|Issue Date: ||2017|
|Publisher: ||© Elsevier|
|Citation: ||FOWMES, G.J. ... et al, 2017. Rapid prototyping of geosynthetic interfaces: Investigation of peak strength using direct shear tests. Geotextiles and Geomembranes, 45 (6), pp. 674-687.|
|Abstract: ||Rapid prototyping offers a platform technology for investigations within the geosynthetics research and manufacturing sectors. This paper considers the application of rapid prototyping for the development of geosynthetic interfaces. The benefits and challenges of three rapid prototyping techniques (fused filament fabrication, selective laser sintering and laser thermal ablation) are considered and comparisons are presented between the three technologies. The paper then compares prototyped models of geomembrane texturing to those of a factory sourced reference geomembrane, leading on to a systematic geometric assessment using laser sintered model geomembranes. The geometric assessment highlights the benefits of hooked geomembrane asperities to interact with geotextiles in low normal stress applications, with a 69% increase in peak shear strength reported for hooked asperities, compared to the factory reference geometry. Asperity spacing is shown to influence the measured shear strength, with an increase for a geomembrane geotextile interfaces with closer asperities and an optimum spacing observed for geomembrane clay interfaces, below which the failure plane slides over the top of the texturing. Increases in asperity height correlated to smaller than expected increases in shear stresses for both geomembrane-geotextile and geomembrane clay interfaces.Whilst current rapid manufacturing techniques are shown to offer the ability to test the influence of variables on the performance characteristics of geosynthetic materials, the limitations of each technique, polymer utilised and resulting chemical and physical behaviour of the sample must be understood to allow these techniques to be successfully deployed.|
|Description: ||This paper is closed access until 4th September 2018.|
|Sponsor: ||The support provided by the Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC) through grant EP/M015483/1 is gratefully acknowledged. The Authors also wish to thank the IGS UK Chapter for project funding.|
|Version: ||Accepted for publication|
|Publisher Link: ||https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geotexmem.2017.08.009|
|Appears in Collections:||Closed Access (Architecture, Building and Civil Engineering)|
Files associated with this item:
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.