+44 (0)1509 263171
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
|Title: ||Paranoia and social inequality|
|Authors: ||Cromby, John|
Harper, David J.
|Issue Date: ||2005|
|Publisher: ||© British Psychological Society|
|Citation: ||CROMBY,J. and HARPER, D., 2005. Paranoia and social inequality. Clinical Psychology Forum, 153, pp. 17-21.|
|Abstract: ||How might we make sense of the findings of epidemiological research showing the effects of social inequalities without accepting the validity of problematic diagnostic categories used by psychiatric epidemiologists (Rogers & Pilgrim, 2003)? How might we make sense of processes happening at a community and systemic level without neglecting individual experience? How should we conceptualise experiences which are embodied (i.e. felt and transmitted through our biological systems) without falling prey to dualistic or biologically reductionist thinking?
In this article, we hope to examine the links between social inequality and paranoia without falling into such traps. We use the term 'paranoia' broadly. Although single symptom research into psychosis has made great strides (e.g. Bentall, 2004) we feel there is benefit to be gained from taking the experience of paranoia as a starting point rather than beginning with an unnecessarily narrow operational definition of, for example, the diagnostic criteria for persecutory delusions. Paranoia, of course, is well-represented in psychiatric diagnostic categories (e.g. paranoid schizophrenia, delusional and personality disorders) and is in some measure a feature of many people’s everyday lives. However, focusing on such categories assumes that the differences between them are both valid and more important than the commonalities in the experiences they represent. Accordingly, we begin by presenting a brief critique of psychiatric thinking about paranoia, followed by a re-theorization that focuses on the social and material constitution of experience through feelings. We end by outlining some implications for intervention.|
|Description: ||This article was published in Clinical Psychology Forum [© British Psychological Society] and is also available at: http://www.bps.org.uk.|
|Appears in Collections:||Published Articles (Sport, Exercise and Health Sciences)|
Files associated with this item:
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.