Loughborough University
Leicestershire, UK
LE11 3TU
+44 (0)1509 263171
Loughborough University

Loughborough University Institutional Repository

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://dspace.lboro.ac.uk/2134/27542

Title: Design implications of drivers’ engagement with secondary activities during highly-automated driving – a longitudinal simulator study
Authors: Large, David R.
Burnett, Gary E.
Morris, Andrew
Muthumani, Arun
Matthias, Rebecca
Keywords: Automation
Secondary activities
Transfer of control
Issue Date: 2017
Citation: LARGE, D.R. ... et al, 2017. Design implications of drivers’ engagement with secondary activities during highly-automated driving – a longitudinal simulator study. Presented at the Road Safety and Simulation International Conference (RSS2017), The Hague, The Netherlands, 17-19 October 2017.
Abstract: Highly-automated vehicles will provide the freedom for drivers to engage in secondary activities while the vehicle is in control. However, little is known regarding the nature of activities that drivers will undertake, and how these may impact drivers’ ability to resume manual control. In a novel, long-term, qualitative simulator study, six experienced drivers completed the same 30-minute motorway journey (portrayed as their commute to work) at the same time on five consecutive weekdays in a highly-automated car; a system ‘health-bar’ indicated the overall status of the automated system during each drive. Participants were invited to bring with them any objects or devices that they would expect to use in their own (automated) vehicle during such a journey, and use these freely during the drives. Inclement weather (heavy fog) on the penultimate day of testing presented an unexpected, emergency 5.0-second take-over request (indicated by an urgent auditory alarm and a flashing visual icon replacing a system ‘health-bar’). Thematic video analysis shows that participants were quickly absorbed by a variety of secondary activities/devices, which typically demanded high levels of visual, manual and cognitive attention, and postural adaptation (e.g. moving/reclining the driver’s seat). The steering wheel was routinely used as a support for objects/devices. Drivers were required to rapidly discharge secondary devices/activities and reestablish driving position/posture following the unexpected, emergency hand-over request on day four. This resulted in notable changes in participants’ subjective ratings of trust on the final day of testing, with some participants apparently more sceptical of the system following the emergency hand-over event, whereas others were more trusting than before. Qualitative results are presented and discussed in the context of the re-design of vehicles to enable the safe and comfortable execution of secondary activities during high-automation, while enabling effective transfer of control.
Description: This paper is closed access.
Version: Accepted for publication
URI: https://dspace.lboro.ac.uk/2134/27542
Publisher Link: http://rss2017.org/
Appears in Collections:Closed Access (Design School)

Files associated with this item:

File Description SizeFormat
RSS.pdfAccepted version1.62 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


SFX Query

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.