Loughborough University
Leicestershire, UK
LE11 3TU
+44 (0)1509 263171
Loughborough University

Loughborough University Institutional Repository

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://dspace.lboro.ac.uk/2134/32219

Title: Assessing clinician's communication skills for promoting patient autonomy for self-management: reliability and validity of the Communication Evaluation in Rehabilitation Tool
Authors: Murray, Aileen
Hall, Amanda M.
Williams, Geoffrey C.
McDonough, Suzanne M.
Ntoumanis, Nikos
Taylor, Ian M.
Jackson, Ben
Copsey, Bethan
Hurley, Deirdre A.
Matthews, James
Keywords: Communication
Self-determination theory
Reliability
Validity
Issue Date: 2018
Publisher: Taylor & Francis
Citation: MURRAY, A. ...et al., 2018. Assessing clinician's communication skills for promoting patient autonomy for self-management: reliability and validity of the Communication Evaluation in Rehabilitation Tool. Disability and Rehabilitation, In Press.
Abstract: Purpose: To assess the inter-rater reliability and concurrent validity of the Communication Evaluation in Rehabilitation Tool, which aims to externally assess physiotherapists’ competency in using Self-Determination Theory-based communication strategies in practice. Materials and Methods: Audio recordings of initial consultations between 24 physiotherapists and 24 patients with chronic low back pain in four hospitals in Ireland were obtained as part of a larger randomised controlled trial. Three raters, all of whom had PhDs in psychology and expertise in motivation and physical activity, independently listened to the 24 audio recordings and completed the 18-item Communication Evaluation in Rehabilitation Tool. Inter-rater reliability between all three raters was assessed using intraclass correlation coefficients. Concurrent validity was assessed using Pearson’s r correlations with a reference standard, the Health Care Climate Questionnaire. Results: The total score for the Communication Evaluation in Rehabilitation Tool is an average of all 18 items. Total scores demonstrated good inter-rater reliability (ICC=0.8) and concurrent validity with the Health Care Climate Questionnaire total score (range: r=0.7-0.88). Item-level scores of the Communication Evaluation in Rehabilitation Tool identified five items that need improvement. Conclusion: Results provide preliminary evidence to support future use and testing of the Communication Evaluation in Rehabilitation Tool.
Description: This paper is in closed access until 27th Feb 2019.
Sponsor: Funding for this study was provided by the Health Research Board (HRB) of Ireland Health Research Award 2010 (HRA_POR/2010/102), including a post-graduate scholarship awarded to the lead author.
Version: Accepted for publication
DOI: 10.1080/09638288.2018.1443159
URI: https://dspace.lboro.ac.uk/2134/32219
Publisher Link: https://doi.org/10.1080/09638288.2018.1443159
ISSN: 1464-5165
Appears in Collections:Closed Access (Sport, Exercise and Health Sciences)

Files associated with this item:

File Description SizeFormat
Taylor_SDT and physiotherapy.pdfAccepted version203.19 kBAdobe PDFView/Open

 

SFX Query

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.