Loughborough University
Leicestershire, UK
LE11 3TU
+44 (0)1509 263171
Loughborough University

Loughborough University Institutional Repository

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://dspace.lboro.ac.uk/2134/32415

Title: Is the longbow better than the crossbow? Emerging issues from mobilising a longitudinal study on a megaproject
Authors: Fuller, Paul A.
Gibb, Alistair G.F.
Jones, Wendy
Dainty, Andrew R.J.
Haslam, Roger
Bust, Phillip D.
Pinder, James
Keywords: Complexity
Longitudinal research
Megaprojects
Occupational health
Strategy
Issue Date: 2017
Publisher: © University of Johannesburg
Citation: FULLER, P.A. ... et al, 2017. Is the longbow better than the crossbow? Emerging issues from mobilising a longitudinal study on a megaproject. Journal of Construction Project Management and Innovation, 7 (2), pp.2054-2065.
Abstract: Longitudinal studies of occupational safety and health (OSH) outcomes in construction projects are rarely conducted, due to the financial, practical and ethical difficulties of studying people, projects, and organisations over extended periods of time. Traditionally, OSH research in the construction industry is cross-sectional – where a ‘snapshot’ is taken, often with a retrospective view. The focus of this paper is the mobilisation of a longitudinal research study investigating OSH policy in an eight-year infrastructure megaproject in the UK. The research examines implementation of the project’s “transformational” OSH strategy, in order to develop new understandings of the effectiveness of OSH interventions. The research design uses a “strategy as practice” lens and traces the various strands of OSH policy, from development to their adoption as practice. The research context is complex, due to the complicated contractual arrangements. The research design incorporates a rarely used “tracer” methodology. During the mobilisation phase of the research project, several challenges were identified, including interpretation and implementation of this tracer methodology, coping with a large team of researchers, obtaining ethics approval and establishing the governance structure, deployment of the team to the site, ensuring consistency in the data collection, managing data sets, and the reliability of the coding. The methodology adopted is time-consuming, and the very large data sets that are generated need to be managed. Complex research project management structures and processes are required, which would not be needed for traditional cross-sectional studies. Sufficient time needs to be allowed at the start of such research projects, in order to put the necessary systems in place. The paper will be of interest to OSH researchers and those contemplating longitudinal studies, particularly those employing a tracer approach.
Description: This paper is also available at http://hdl.handle.net/10520/EJC-c2417cc42.
Version: Published
URI: https://dspace.lboro.ac.uk/2134/32415
Publisher Link: http://hdl.handle.net/10520/EJC-c2417cc42
ISSN: 2223-7852
Appears in Collections:Published Articles (Design School)
Published Articles (Architecture, Building and Civil Engineering)

Files associated with this item:

File Description SizeFormat
jcpmi_v7_n2_a6.pdfPublished version371 kBAdobe PDFView/Open

 

SFX Query

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.