Loughborough University
Leicestershire, UK
LE11 3TU
+44 (0)1509 263171
Loughborough University

Loughborough University Institutional Repository

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://dspace.lboro.ac.uk/2134/32786

Title: Establishing intellectually impaired victims’ understanding about ‘truth’ and ‘lies’: Police interview guidance and practice in cases of sexual assault
Authors: Richardson, Emma
Stokoe, Elizabeth
Antaki, Charles
Keywords: Sexual assault
Rape
Police interviews
Communication guidance
Victims
Intellectual impairment
Issue Date: 2018
Publisher: © The Authors. Published by Oxford University Press (OUP)
Citation: RICHARDSON, E., STOKOE, E. and ANTAKI, C., 2018. Establishing intellectually impaired victims’ understanding about ‘truth’ and ‘lies’: Police interview guidance and practice in cases of sexual assault. Applied Linguistics, In Press.
Abstract: Effective police interviews are central to the justice process for sexual assault victims, but little is known about actual communication between police officers and witnesses, nor about the alignment between guidance and real practice. This study investigated how police officers, in formal interviews, follow ‘best evidence’ guidance to obtain victims’ demonstrable understandings of ‘truth and lies’. We conducted qualitative conversation analysis of 20 evidentiary interviews between police officers and victims who were ‘vulnerable’ adults, or children. Analysis revealed that interviewers initiated conversation about truth and lies inappropriately in three ways: 1) by eliciting confirmations rather than demonstrations of understanding; 2) by eliciting multiple demonstrations and confirmations of understanding, or 3) by re-introducing ‘truth and lies’ conversations at incorrect points in the interview. Both 2) and 3) imply prior or forthcoming dishonesty on the part of the victim. In the context of encouraging victims to report sexual assault, and achieve justice, the paper reveals potential communicative barriers in which victims – or their evidence – may be discredited right at the start of the process.
Description: This paper is in closed access until 08/06/2020
Version: Accepted for publication
DOI: 10.1093/applin/amy023
URI: https://dspace.lboro.ac.uk/2134/32786
Publisher Link: https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amy023
ISSN: 0142-6001
Appears in Collections:Closed Access (Communication, Media, Social and Policy Studies)

Files associated with this item:

File Description SizeFormat
Applied Linguistics FINAL MARCH 2018.pdfAccepted version290.37 kBAdobe PDFView/Open

 

SFX Query

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.