Loughborough University
Leicestershire, UK
LE11 3TU
+44 (0)1509 263171
Loughborough University

Loughborough University Institutional Repository

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://dspace.lboro.ac.uk/2134/32833

Title: A comparative life cycle assessment approach of 5 alternative technologies for converting municipal solid waste (MSW) into chemicals and electricity in the UK
Authors: Chiarasumran, Nutchapon
Blanchard, Richard E.
Benyahia, Brahim
Keywords: MSW
Methanol production
DME production
Issue Date: 2018
Citation: CHIARASUMRAN, N., BLANCHARD, R.E. and BENYAHIA, B., 2018. A comparative life cycle assessment approach of 5 alternative technologies for converting municipal solid waste (MSW) into chemicals and electricity in the UK. Presented at the 6th International Congress on Green Process Engineering, Toulouse, France, 3-6th June.
Abstract: This study develops a systematic life cycle assessment approach for 5 alternative technologies that can be used to convert municipal solid waste (MSW) into chemicals and electricity. Particular attention is given to the combustion and gasification as the main conversion processes and the UK’s MSW is used here as the case study. The investigation focusses on 5 different scenarios: (1) combustion and electricity generation, (2) gasification and electricity generation, (3) methanol synthesis from syngas with electricity co-production (4), dimethyl ether (DME) synthesis from produced methanol by syngas (indirect synthesis) and power generation, and (5) DME synthesis from syngas (direct synthesis) and electricity co-production. The unreacted gas left from the methanol or DME synthesis process can also be employed as a fuel gas for the electricity generation. As the result, it is interesting to find out which method is the most appropriate and optimal to convert the UK’s MSW. The environmental impacts are evaluated by IMPACT2002+ method using Ecoinvent 3 as a database. The results show that scenario 5 (direct DME synthesis with electricity co-production) causes the least climate change impact (532 kg CO2 eq.) and resource impact (-5560 MJ primary), followed by scenario 4 (544 kg CO2 eq. and -5250 MJ primary), scenario 3 (569 kg CO2 eq. and - 4820 MJ primary), scenario 1 (591 kg CO2 eq. and -3880 MJ primary) and scenario 2 (881 kg CO2 eq. and -3900 MJ primary) respectively. However, the study also demonstrates that the scenarios involving methanol and DME synthesis have more impacts on human health category due to the required metal oxide catalysts. The impact of a change in total yield of methanol and DME synthesis is also investigated and analysed along with the associated potential environmental benefits.
Description: This is a conference paper.
Version: Accepted for publication
URI: https://dspace.lboro.ac.uk/2134/32833
Publisher Link: http://www.gpe2018.org/
Appears in Collections:Conference Papers and Presentations (Chemical Engineering)
Conference Papers and Presentations (Mechanical, Electrical and Manufacturing Engineering)

Files associated with this item:

File Description SizeFormat
Abstract_Nutchapon_GPE18_April 2018_final.pdfAccepted version208.05 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


SFX Query

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.