Loughborough University
Browse
Tudor academic resilience review IJRSE (2017).pdf (247.13 kB)

Approaches to measuring academic resilience: A systematic review

Download (247.13 kB)
journal contribution
posted on 2018-05-29, 13:33 authored by Kate E. Tudor, Christopher SprayChristopher Spray
Recent years have seen increased government funding into resilience-building programmes in schools. However, practitioners are unable to assess the efficacy of interventions due to the lack of an available measure of academic resilience. The aim of this review is to provide an overview of the methods investigators have employed to measure academic resilience. A computerised literature search was conducted to identify journal articles where academic resilience was either; a) inferred through assessment of risk and positive adaptation or b) assessed using a measurement scale comprising protective factors. Results demonstrated significant variability in the factors utilised to represent risk and positive adaptation, and an inconsistent use of measurement scales. Different approaches to measuring academic resilience across studies leads to inconsistencies when estimating prevalence of the concept and the impact of resilience-based interventions. A discussion of the psychometric rigor of approaches to assessment is provided, with specific recommendations for future development of a measurement of academic resilience.

History

School

  • Sport, Exercise and Health Sciences

Published in

International Journal of Research Studies in Education

Volume

7

Issue

4

Citation

TUDOR, K.E. and SPRAY, C.M., 2017. Approaches to measuring academic resilience: A systematic review. International Journal of Research Studies in Education, 7 (4), pp.41-61.

Publisher

Consortia Academia Publishing © The Authors

Version

  • VoR (Version of Record)

Publisher statement

This work is made available according to the conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) licence. Full details of this licence are available at: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

Acceptance date

2017-09-30

Publication date

2017-10-07

Notes

This is an Open Access Article. It is published by Consortia Academia Publishing under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International Licence (CC BY-NC-ND). Full details of this licence are available at: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

ISSN

2243-7703

eISSN

2243-7711

Language

  • en