Loughborough University
Browse
Oswald, Sherratt, Smith and Dainty Accepted Version.pdf (301.28 kB)

An exploration into the implications of the ‘compensation culture’ on construction safety

Download (301.28 kB)
journal contribution
posted on 2018-07-02, 10:26 authored by David Oswald, F. Sherratt, Simon D. Smith, Andrew Dainty
In UK society there has been a growing perception that unjustified, frivolous or fraudulent legal claims are being made following safety accidents or incidents, in what has become known as a ‘compensation culture’. Participant observation of construction practice during a three year period enabled the unpacking of the complexity of the compensation culture as manifested on a large construction project (+£500 m) in the UK, and revealed associated implications for safety management. The wider social perception a compensation culture exists in UK society was also found to being the case in the more narrow setting of this construction site, as making fraudulent compensation claims against their own organisations was a socially acceptable behaviour within some front-line workgroups. The organisation recognised this and took numerous steps to protect themselves from potential liability; which was unhelpful for safety, as actions were more about managing potential claims, than managing safety. This study demonstrates that the way H&S is viewed in a wider social context can influence the way H&S is managed in organisations, has provided deeper socio-cultural understanding into the complexity of safety practices, and raises important questions about our research approaches, which have traditionally focused in positivist roots, and have been unable to holistically capture social aspects that influence safety.

History

School

  • Architecture, Building and Civil Engineering

Published in

Safety Science

Volume

109

Pages

294-302

Citation

OSWALD, D. ... et al, 2018. An exploration into the implications of the ‘compensation culture’ on construction safety. Safety Science, 109, pp.294-302.

Publisher

© Elsevier

Version

  • AM (Accepted Manuscript)

Publisher statement

This paper was accepted for publication in the journal Safety Science and the definitive published version is available at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2018.06.009

Acceptance date

2018-06-17

Publication date

2018-06-26

Copyright date

2018

ISSN

0925-7535

Language

  • en

Usage metrics

    Loughborough Publications

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC