Loughborough University
Leicestershire, UK
LE11 3TU
+44 (0)1509 263171
Loughborough University

Loughborough University Institutional Repository

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://dspace.lboro.ac.uk/2134/34124

Title: Eligibility and bad news delivery: How call-takers reject applicants to university
Authors: Hoey, Elliott M.
Stokoe, Elizabeth
Keywords: Conversation analysis
Preference organization
University admissions
Bad news
Issue Date: 2018
Publisher: © Elsevier
Citation: HOEY, E.M. and STOKOE, E., 2018. Eligibility and bad news delivery: How call-takers reject applicants to university. Linguistics and Education, 46, pp.91-101.
Abstract: This paper examines how delivering bad news may be avoided in conversations where rejection is common. We collected ∼2000 recordings of telephone calls from prospective students to a UK university contact centre during an annual process called ‘Clearing and Adjustment’. Applicants call to secure a place on a degree programme but are often ineligible due to insufficient grades. Based on a sample of 200 calls analyzed using conversation analysis, we show that call-takers determined applicants’ eligibility in two main ways: call-takers could (1) solicit applicants’ grades, or (2) inform applicants about the course's entry requirements. Following solicitations, call-takers’ next action was to reject applicants. However, following informings, students deduced their own ineligibility and explicit rejection was avoided. The relationship between method (‘solicit’ v. ‘inform’) and the occurrence of overt rejection was highly significant (p < 0001). We discuss the implementation of our findings in call-taker training to enable them to avoid giving out rejections.
Description: This paper is closed access until 20 July 2020.
Version: Accepted for publication
DOI: 10.1016/j.linged.2018.07.001
URI: https://dspace.lboro.ac.uk/2134/34124
Publisher Link: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.linged.2018.07.001
ISSN: 0898-5898
Appears in Collections:Closed Access (Communication, Media, Social and Policy Studies)

Files associated with this item:

File Description SizeFormat
Hoey Stokoe 2018 Linguistics in Education IR.pdfAccepted version507.18 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


SFX Query

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.