Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
|Title: ||Economic instruments and traffic restraint|
|Authors: ||Potter, Stephen|
Enoch, Marcus P.
|Issue Date: ||2003|
|Publisher: ||Ashgate Publishing Limited|
|Citation: ||POTTER, S., ENOCH, M.P. and RYE, T., 2003. Economic instruments and traffic restraint. IN: Hine, J. and Preston J., (eds.). Integrated futures and transport choices : UK transport policy beyond the 1998 White Paper. Transport and society series. London : Ashgate Publications, pp. 287-304|
|Series/Report no.: ||Transport and society series|
|Abstract: ||Tax and Transport Policy:
In recent years there have been increasingly strong linkages between national fiscal systems and
environmental/transport objectives. Within the European Union, European Commission (EC) policy
has been outlined in documents such as ‘Towards Fair and Efficient Pricing’ (1), and ‘Fair Payment
for Infrastructure Use’ (2). In summary these well-researched documents advocate that transport
infrastructure charges should normally reflect the marginal social costs at the point of use. These
marginal social costs should include not only marginal wear and tear costs on infrastructure, but also
‘external’ costs imposed on society, the environment and the wider economy through accidents,
pollution, emission of climate change gases, congestion etc.. While regulatory and physical design
mechanisms are also recognised as having an important role to play, it is tax and charging instruments
that the European Commission and national states see as being most effective at encouraging efficient
and sustainable transport systems in the longer term.
In practice, moving towards such a strategic policy aim has proved problematic. In the first place,
transport taxation is an increasingly political sensitive subject, as the autumn 2000 ‘fuel price’ protests
in several European countries showed. Furthermore, it seems unlikely that marginal changes in the
fiscal framework would provide sufficient encouragement to make a real difference in consumer
behaviour. It requires a major restructuring to address the issue of environmental performance. This
chapter therefore explores the potential to move towards more radical actions in a way that might
succeed in overcoming the shortcomings experienced by more short term strategies.
Structure of the Chapter:
This chapter first considers the purposes of taxation and the implications of this for the use of fiscal
policies in the new transport agenda of managing transport demand. It then considers the fiscal
policies that can be used to influence consumer behaviour in acquiring and using different forms of
transport, before going on to explain how these policies have – or have not – been used in the recent
past in the UK.
The chapter then argues that the use of fiscal policies has been quite limited, particularly in comparison
to other countries. It therefore advocates and examines the implications of the adoption of a wider
range of fiscal policies, as part of a wider package of economic instruments and regulations to achieve
transport demand management in an effective manner that also recognises the political sensitivities
|Description: ||This is the author's own final version of a book chapter. The book, Integrated futures and transport choices is available from: http://www.ashgate.com/isbn/9780754619918|
|Appears in Collections:||Book Chapters (Architecture, Building and Civil Engineering)|
Files associated with this item:
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.