Loughborough University
Leicestershire, UK
LE11 3TU
+44 (0)1509 263171
Loughborough University

Loughborough University Institutional Repository

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://dspace.lboro.ac.uk/2134/35730

Title: Stepovers and signal detection: Response sensitivity and bias in the differentiation of genuine and deceptive football actions
Authors: Jackson, Robin C.
Barton, Hayley
Ashford, Kelly J.
Abernethy, Bruce
Keywords: Anticipation
Deception
Signal detection
Perception
Bias
Issue Date: 2018
Publisher: Frontiers Media © Jackson, Barton, Ashford and Abernethy
Citation: JACKSON, R.C. ... et al, 2018. Stepovers and signal detection: Response sensitivity and bias in the differentiation of genuine and deceptive football actions. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, Article 2043.
Abstract: The ability to differentiate genuine and deceptive actions was examined using a combination of spatial and temporal occlusion to examine sensitivity to lower body, upper body, and full body sources of visual information. High-skilled and low-skilled association football players judged whether a player genuinely intended to take the ball to the participant’s left or right or intended to step over the ball then take it in the other direction. Signal detection analysis was used to calculate measures of sensitivity (d′) in differentiating genuine and deceptive actions and bias (c) toward judging an action to be genuine or deceptive. Analysis revealed that high-skilled players had higher sensitivity than low-skilled players and this was consistent across all spatial occlusion conditions. Low-skilled players were more biased toward judging actions to be genuine. Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curves revealed that accuracy on deceptive trials in the lower body and full body conditions most accurately classified participants as high-skilled or low-skilled. The results highlight the value of using signal detection analysis in studies of deceptive actions. They suggest that information from the lower body or upper body was sufficient for differentiating genuine and deceptive actions and that global information concurrently derived from these sources was not necessary to support the expert advantage.
Description: This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. Full details of this licence are available at: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Version: Published
DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02043
URI: https://dspace.lboro.ac.uk/2134/35730
Publisher Link: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02043
Appears in Collections:Published Articles (Sport, Exercise and Health Sciences)

Files associated with this item:

File Description SizeFormat
Jackson etal 2018 Stepovers and signal detection.pdfPublished version1.46 MBAdobe PDFView/Open

 

SFX Query

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.