Loughborough University
Leicestershire, UK
LE11 3TU
+44 (0)1509 263171
Loughborough University

Loughborough University Institutional Repository

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://dspace.lboro.ac.uk/2134/37127

Title: Applying a longitudinal tracer methodology to evaluate complex interventions in complex settings
Authors: Fuller, Paul A.
Randall, Raymond
Dainty, Andrew R.J.
Haslam, Roger
Gibb, Alistair G.F.
Keywords: Evaluation
Longitudinal
Tracer methodology
Occupational safety and health
Realist
Organisational change
Issue Date: 2019
Publisher: © Taylor & Francis (Routledge)
Citation: FULLER, P.A. ... et al., 2019. Applying a longitudinal tracer methodology to evaluate complex interventions in complex settings. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, doi:10.1080/1359432X.2019.1598973.
Abstract: Long-running multi-faceted intervention studies are particularly problematic in large and complex organizations where traditional methods prove too resource intensive and can yield inaccurate and incomplete findings. This paper describes the first use of, longitudinal tracer methodology (LTM), a realist approach to evaluation, to examine the links between multiple complex intervention activities (intervention processes) and their outcomes on a construction megaproject. LTM is especially useful when the researcher has little control over intervention delivery but has access to evidence drawn from a variety of sources to evaluate the effects of intervention activities over time. There are, however, very few examples of how this methodology can be successfully deployed in complex organisational settings and none on a construction megaproject. In this paper we present a case study of its use over a period of three years, on 24 construction sites forming London’s Thames Tideway Tunnel (Tideway) megaproject. The aim of the study was to examine the ‘transformational’ power of occupational safety and health (OSH) interventions as they played out across the multiple organisations and supply chains that constituted the megaproject. The case study shows how, with careful design, the method can be adapted in-flight to accommodate shifting lines of inquiry as the intervention activities progress and change. This feature of the method, along with its resource efficient operation, make it a particularly attractive option where interventions are likely to have differential effects across multiple sites of enactment.
Description: This paper is in closed access until 22 April 2020.
Version: Accepted for publication
DOI: 10.1080/1359432X.2019.1598973
URI: https://dspace.lboro.ac.uk/2134/37127
Publisher Link: https://doi.org/10.1080/1359432X.2019.1598973
ISSN: 1464-0643
Appears in Collections:Closed Access (Design School)
Closed Access (Architecture, Building and Civil Engineering)
Closed Access (Business)

Files associated with this item:

File Description SizeFormat
EJWAOP Paper Fuller et al LTM rev4 140319 FINAL RESUBMITTED.pdfAccepted version563.28 kBAdobe PDFView/Open

 

SFX Query

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.