Loughborough University
Leicestershire, UK
LE11 3TU
+44 (0)1509 263171
Loughborough University

Loughborough University Institutional Repository

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://dspace.lboro.ac.uk/2134/3878

Title: Accountability in the provision of urban services
Authors: Cavill, Sue
Sohail (Khan), M.
Keywords: Local government
Municipal & public service engineering
Social impact
Issue Date: 2003
Publisher: © Thomas Telford Publishing
Citation: CAVILL, S. and SOHAIL, M., 2003. Accountability in the provision of urban services. Proceedings of ICE, Municipal Engineer, 156 (ME4), pp. 235-244
Abstract: This paper assesses the potential of accountability arrangements to improve the quality of local services as well as the responsiveness of services providers to the needs of users and in particular those of the poor. In the first section of this paper municipal services are embedded in a social and political context, before moving on to explore a broad set of contemporary innovations in the way services are delivered. The research on which this paper is based was undertaken in cities and so specific attention is paid to urban areas. Accountability is defined using the existing literature and the current models for accountability are presented. In the second part of the paper research from case studies in South Africa, Bangladesh and the UK are presented. These studies reveal that while the provision of urban services is often based on ethics that is, that no one should be disadvantaged by where they live (in the UK) or that everyone should have access to services such as water, sanitation, and electricity (in South Africa) ethics alone are not enough to ensure adequate urban services. Accountability is most effective when these ethics are translated into more tangible rights or guarantees of performance, which enable ethics to be realised. Increasingly, however, accountability is used to better manage services and their users and has been reduced to a set of technical tools and procedural measures which can be universally applied. Consequently, ethics do not necessarily function as an input to systems of accountability. In conclusion, it is recognised that accountability cannot be reduced to a technocratic, politics-free management tool but are a product of a particular socio-cultural context.
Description: This article was published in the journal, Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers, Waste and Resource Management [© Thomas Telford] and is also available at: http://www.thomastelford.com/journals/
URI: https://dspace.lboro.ac.uk/2134/3878
ISSN: 0965-0903
1751-7699
Appears in Collections:Published Articles (WEDC)

Files associated with this item:

File Description SizeFormat
muen.156.4.235.pdf153.23 kBAdobe PDFView/Open

 

SFX Query

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.