+44 (0)1509 263171
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
|Title: ||The potential for further changes to the personal taxation regime to encourage modal shift. Final report for Department of the Environment, Transport and the Regions, London, June|
|Authors: ||Potter, Stephen|
Enoch, Marcus P.
|Issue Date: ||2001|
|Publisher: ||© Department of the Environment, Transport and the Regions|
|Citation: ||POTTER, S. ... et al, 2001. The potential for further changes to the personal taxation regime to encourage modal shift. Final report for Department of the Environment, Transport and the Regions, London, June|
|Abstract: ||This project was commissioned by the DETR to fulfil a commitment made in the 1998 white paper on
integrated transport, A New Deal for Transport: Better for Everyone. This was to carry out research on
the influence of the existing tax system with a view to seeing whether changes could be effective in
promoting the use of more environmentally friendly forms of transport.
The report includes a review of the UK tax treatment of commuting benefits, which is compared to
those of other countries with a different tax regime. Key points include:
• A general tax concession for all commuting trips creates negative transport and environmental
impacts; it tends to stimulate car commuting and trip lengthening and is costly to the state
concerned. A capped commuting concession would reduce these problems.
• In countries with a similar tax treatment of commuting as exists in the UK, targeted tax
concessions upon employer-provided Travel Plan benefits have featured. This add private sector
resources to the tax concession and enhances the modal shift effect.
The most effective Travel Plan measures involve direct financial incentives and disincentives. In
general the car use reduction effects of different Travel Plans is:
• Zero for information-only Travel Plans
• 5% for schemes consisting mainly of carpooling;
• 8 - 10% for those incorporating financial incentives to use alternative modes, and
• 15%+ for those that included financial disincentives to car use.
In the UK, many of the most effective measures are affected by the personal tax system.
A survey of employers developing Travel Plans was conducted, which concluded that:
• Although information and guidance may appear an appropriate response where there is a lack of
understanding of the tax liability of Travel Plan measures, the use of such an approach would be
ineffective without being spearheaded by actual tax reform.
• The issue of tax clashes with a company’s ‘tax-efficient’ culture is of most significance when
organisations are trying to develop their Travel Plans from their initial, fairly ineffective stages, to
be more effective by the use of financial incentives and disincentives.
• There is evidence that tax does reduce the effectiveness of Travel Plan measures and that some
modest and targeted reform measures could both eliminate most of the negative tax impacts and
ease the development of Travel Plans within a company’s dominant culture ...|
|Appears in Collections:||Official Reports (Architecture, Building and Civil Engineering)|
Files associated with this item:
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.