Loughborough University
Leicestershire, UK
LE11 3TU
+44 (0)1509 263171
Loughborough University

Loughborough University Institutional Repository

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://dspace.lboro.ac.uk/2134/4473

Title: Exploring career transitions: accounting for structure and agency
Authors: Duberley, Joanne
Mallon, Mary
Cohen, Laurie
Keywords: Career development
Issue Date: 2006
Publisher: © Emerald Group Publishing Limited
Citation: DUBERLEY, J., MALLON, M. and COHEN, L., 2006. Exploring career transitions: accounting for structure and agency. Personnel Review, 35 (3), pp. 281 - 296
Abstract: Purpose – To apply and develop Stephen Barley's model of career structuration to offer insights into the transition into portfolio working. Design/methodology/approach – A qualitative case study methodology is used. Interviews were conducted with managers who had left the National Health Service to develop portfolio careers. Findings – The adoption of the Barley model of career structuration as a sensitising device has made it possible to show how individuals have drawn from existing scripts embedded in institutional forms but have also contributed to developing new career scripts, such as portfolio working. Their enactment of career scripts is a dynamic process whereby they impact back on those scripts in both intentional and unintentional ways. Thus the transformative capacity of individual career actions is asserted but, critically, alongside awareness of constraints as bound up in structures which have salience for individuals and for collectives. Research limitations/implications – This is a study based in one large public sector organisation. Further exploration of the potential role of career as a way of understanding socially embedded action and its capacity for change is required, which takes account of different occupational settings. Practical implications – The study outlines some of the frustrations experienced by portfolio workers and has practical implications for the ways in which they should be managed. Originality/value – The paper contributes to the debate concerning structure and agency in career theory.
Description: This article is Restricted Access. It was published in the journal, Personnel Review [© Emerald Group Publishing Limited]. The definitive version is available at: www.emeraldinsight.com/10.1108/00483480610656694
Version: Restricted access
DOI: 10.1108/00483480610656694
URI: https://dspace.lboro.ac.uk/2134/4473
ISSN: 0048-3486
Appears in Collections:Closed Access (Business School)

Files associated with this item:

File Description SizeFormat
personnel review structureagency.pdf310.93 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


SFX Query

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.