Loughborough University
Leicestershire, UK
LE11 3TU
+44 (0)1509 263171
Loughborough University

Loughborough University Institutional Repository

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://dspace.lboro.ac.uk/2134/6007

Title: On the design of forgiving biometric security systems
Authors: Phan, Raphael C.-W.
Whitley, John N.
Parish, David J.
Issue Date: 2009
Publisher: © IFIP International Federation for Information Processing / Springer
Citation: PHAN, R.C.-W., WHITLEY, J.N. and PARISH, D.J., 2009. On the design of forgiving biometric security systems. IN: Proceedings of the Workshop on Open Research Problems in Network Security (iNetSec '09), Zurich, Switzerland, April 23-24, pp. 1-8
Series/Report no.: IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology;Vol. 309
Abstract: This work aims to highlight the fundamental issue surrounding biometric security systems: it's all very nice until a biometric is forged, but what do we do after that? Granted, biometric systems are by physical nature supposedly much harder to forge than other factors of authentication since biometrics on a human body are by right unique to the particular human person. Yet it is also due to this physical nature that makes it much more catastrophic when a forgery does occur, because it implies that this uniqueness has been forged as well, threatening the human individuality; and since crime has by convention relied on identifying suspects by biometric characteristics, loss of this biometric uniqueness has devastating consequences on the freedom and basic human rights of the victimized individual. This uniqueness forgery implication also raises the motivation on the adversary to forge since a successful forgery leads to much more impersonation situations when biometric systems are used i.e. physical presence at crime scenes, identi cation and access to security systems and premises, access to nancial accounts and hence the ability to use the victim's nances. Depending on the gains, a desperate highly motivated adversary may even resort to directly obtaining the victim's biometric parts by force e.g. severing the parts from the victim's body; this poses a risk and threat not just to the individual's uniqueness claim but also to personal safety and well being. One may then wonder if it is worth putting one's assets, property and safety into the hands of biometrics based systems when the consequences of biometric forgery far outweigh the consequences of system compromises when no biometrics are used.
Description: This is a conference paper, the original publication is available at www.springerlink.com, further information can be obtained from http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-05437-2_1
Version: Accepted for publication
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-05437-2_1
URI: https://dspace.lboro.ac.uk/2134/6007
ISBN: 9783642054365
ISSN: 1868-4238
1868-422X
Appears in Collections:Conference Papers and Contributions (Mechanical, Electrical and Manufacturing Engineering)

Files associated with this item:

File Description SizeFormat
iNSbior49.pdf128.53 kBAdobe PDFView/Open

 

SFX Query

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.