Loughborough University
Browse
king2005.pdf (262.25 kB)

Factors influencing performance in the Hecht vault and implications for modelling

Download (262.25 kB)
journal contribution
posted on 2010-09-15, 11:25 authored by Mark KingMark King, Fred YeadonFred Yeadon
This paper investigated the factors that influence Hecht vault performance and assessed the level of model complexity required to give an adequate representation of vaulting. A five-segment planar simulation model with a visco-elastic shoulder joint and a torque generator at the shoulder joint was used to simulate the contact phase in vaulting. The model was customised to an elite gymnast by determining subject-specific segmental inertia and joint torque parameters. The simulation model was matched to a performance of the Hecht vault by varying the visco-elastic characteristics of the shoulders and the arm–horse interface and the activation time history of the shoulder torque generator until the best match was found. Perturbing the matching simulation demonstrated that appropriate initial kinematics are necessary for a successful performance. Fixing the hip and knee angles at their initial values had a small effect with 3 less rotation. Applying shoulder torque during the contact phase also had a small effect with only a 7 range in landing angles. Excluding the hand segment from the model was found to have a moderate effect with 15 less rotation and the time of contact reduced by 38%. Removing shoulder elasticity resulted in 50 less rotation. The use of a five-segment simulation model confirmed that the use of shoulder torque plays a minor role in vaulting performance and that having appropriate initial kinematics at touchdown is essential. However, factors such as shoulder elasticity and the hands which have previously been ignored also have a substantial influence on performance.

History

School

  • Sport, Exercise and Health Sciences

Citation

KING, M.A. and YEADON, M.R., 2005. Factors influencing performance in the Hecht vault and implications for modelling. Journal of Biomechanics, 38 (1), pp. 145-151.

Publisher

© Elsevier

Version

  • AM (Accepted Manuscript)

Publication date

2005

ISSN

0021-9290

Language

  • en