Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
|Title: ||A comparative study of experiences of violence in Malaysian and English hospitals|
|Authors: ||Mat Saat, Geshina|
|Keywords: ||Consequences of violence|
Risk of violence
Threat of violence
Trigger of violence
|Issue Date: ||2010|
|Publisher: ||© G.A. Mat Saat|
|Abstract: ||This PhD thesis compared incidents of violence in two Malaysian hospitals and two
English hospitals. Using a model of workplace violence, the aims of the thesis were to
explore and compare six constructs: extrinsic, intrinsic, triggers, experiences,
moderators, and consequences of workplace violence as perceived by Malaysian and
English hospital staff. This study used data on experiences of violence gathered in 2005
for incidences in hospitals that occurred up to one year before the survey. The 2004
data from the Incident Report database (IRD) of the English hospitals was also used.
Two instruments were developed for this thesis. First was the General Violence
Victimization Questionnaire (GVQ), an instrument to identify the types, prevalence,
nature, consequences, post-incident support, and reporting trends of violence in
hospitals. The second instrument was the Violence Victimization Semi-structured
Interview (VicQ) which explored factors leading to the violent incident, the violent
incident itself, and psycho-social issues relating to the violent incident. Both instruments
were translated into the Malay language for use in Malaysia.
227 people participated in the quantitative survey: 162 people from the Malaysian
Government Hospitals (MGH) and 115 people from the National Health Service (NHS).
A total of 25 people volunteered to be interviewed as part of the qualitative aspect of the
study: 15 from the MGH and 10 from the NHS.
Six categories of violence were compared: verbal, nonverbal, threat, physical, sexual,
and psychologically-based. A total of 4118 violent incidents (1402 in MGH and 2716 in
NHS) were reported. The most common type of violence was psychologically-based
violence in the MGH and verbal violence in the NHS.
Both samples perceived that the major source of workplace violence was from patients
and involved one male perpetrator. There were differences between the two samples
indicative of cultural differences. Of those interviewed, the Malaysian participants
perceived that offenders were intrinsically motivated to offend. The English participants
perceived that offenders had either intrinsic or extrinsic motivation for perpetuating
violence. Differences were noted for substance abuse and customer relations as
triggers of organisational violence. Comparisons of moderators were different for the two
country samples. Comparisons of consequences were not significantly different.
Comparisons across several demographic variables (gender, age, and occupational
groupings were not significant between the two country samples with regards to
workplace violence victimisation. However, a comparison of length of service was found
to be significant. The final path model differed from the original model of workplace
violence. Additional findings include a difference between the established definition and
participants‘ definition of workplace violence, a lack of anti-violence policies in Malaysian
hospitals, under reporting, and unforeseen direct and direct relationships among the six
|Description: ||A Doctoral Thesis. Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the award of Doctor of Philosophy of Loughborough University.|
|Appears in Collections:||PhD Theses (Business)|
Files associated with this item:
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.