RME2008_preprint[1].pdf (282.99 kB)
A diagrammatic view of the equals sign: arithmetical equivalence as a means, not an end
journal contribution
posted on 2011-07-07, 11:15 authored by Ian JonesIt is recommended in the mathematics education literature that pupils be presented with equality statements that can be assessed for numerical balance by attending to notational structure rather than computation. I describe an alternative, diagrammatic approach in which pupils do not assess statements but instead use them to make substitutions of notation. I report on two trials of a computer-based task conducted with pairs of pupils and highlight two findings. First, the pupils found it useful to articulate the distinct substitutive effects of commutative (‘swap’, ‘switch’) and partitional (‘split’, ‘separate’) statements when working on the task. Secondly, the pupils did not notice that some of the statements presented were in fact false, which suggests their substituting activities were independent of numerical equivalence conceptions. This demonstrates that making substitutions offers task designers a mathematical utility for equality statements that is distinct from, but complementary to, assessing numerical balance.
History
School
- Science
Department
- Mathematics Education Centre
Citation
JONES, I., 2008. A diagrammatic view of the equals sign: arithmetical equivalence as a means, not an end. Research in Mathematics Education, 10 (2), pp. 151-165.Publisher
Routledge (© British Society for Research into Learning Mathematics)Version
- AM (Accepted Manuscript)
Publication date
2008Notes
This article was published in the journal, Research in Mathematics Education [Routledge/Taylor & Francis © British Society for Research into Learning Mathematics] and the original publication is available at http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/rrme20ISSN
1479-4802;1754-0178Publisher version
Language
- en
Administrator link
Usage metrics
Categories
No categories selectedLicence
Exports
RefWorks
BibTeX
Ref. manager
Endnote
DataCite
NLM
DC