Loughborough University
Leicestershire, UK
LE11 3TU
+44 (0)1509 263171
Loughborough University

Loughborough University Institutional Repository

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://dspace.lboro.ac.uk/2134/8912

Title: Successful illicit opium production suppression interventions: a comparative analysis of China, Iran, Turkey, Thailand, Pakistan, Viet Nam and Laos
Authors: Windle, James
Keywords: Alternative development
Case study
Drug law enforcement
Supply side drug policy
Issue Date: 2011
Publisher: © James Windle
Abstract: This study departs from existing scholarship by analysing and documenting nine cases of national success to inform three primary objectives: (1) To catalogue cases of success for future reference; (2) To producing lessons that may improve the effectiveness of interventions whilst reducing inadvertent negative outcomes; (3) To reconcile the discrepancy between national and international effects of interventions at the source. A comparison of the nine cases of national success found: (1) All governments perceived suppression as in its best interest; (2) All possessed authority throughout opium producing areas; (3) In all but two cases the state offered incentives from which farmers perceived some benefit to the cessation of opium production; (4) All governments possessed the capability to monitor opium farmers; (5) All interventions administered law enforcement. As these five factors presented across all or most cases they can be considered necessary for a successful outcome. Additional factors, which crossed more than one case, were deemed facilitative of the five necessary factors, and included: development-orientated approaches; community punishments; negotiated eradication; and conflict resolution/limitation. The findings suggest that the primary objective when planning a national intervention must be the establishment or maintenance of the five necessary factors. As such, premature eradication - which often deviates from the establishment/maintenance of the five necessary factors - represents an erroneous path, which can be costly in terms of time and resources. The case of Afghanistan is used to further clarify and explore the cross-case findings in a practical context.
Description: This thesis is confidential until 31 July 2019. A Doctoral Thesis. Submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the award of Doctor of Philosophy of Loughborough University.
Version: Closed Access
URI: https://dspace.lboro.ac.uk/2134/8912
Appears in Collections:Closed Access PhD theses (Social Sciences)

Files associated with this item:

File Description SizeFormat
Thesis-2011-Windle2.58 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Form-2014-Windle.pdf712.64 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


SFX Query

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.