+44 (0)1509 263171
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
|Title: ||The role of diffusion on the interface thickness in a ventilated filling box|
|Authors: ||Kaye, N.B.|
Cook, Malcolm J.
|Issue Date: ||2010|
|Publisher: ||© Cambridge University Press|
|Citation: ||KAYE, N.B. ... et al, 2010. The role of diffusion on the interface thickness in a ventilated filling box. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 652, pp. 195-205|
|Abstract: ||We examine the role of diffusivity, whether molecular or turbulent, on the steady-state stratification in a ventilated filling box. The buoyancy-driven displacement ventilation model of Linden et al. (J. Fluid Mech., vol. 212, 1990, p. 309) predicts the formation of a two-layer stratification when a single plume is introduced into an enclosure with vents at the top and bottom. The model assumes that diffusion plays no role in the development of the ambient buoyancy stratification: diffusion is a slow process and the entrainment of ambient fluid into the plume from the diffuse interface will act to thin the interface resulting in a near discontinuity of density between the upper and lower layers. This prediction has been corroborated by small-scale salt bath experiments; however, full-scale measurements in ventilated rooms and complementary numerical simulations suggest an interface that is not sharp but rather smeared out over a finite thickness. For a given plume buoyancy flux, as the cross-sectional area of the enclosure increases the volume of fluid that must be entrained by the plume to maintain a sharp interface also increases. Therefore the balance between the diffusive thickening of the interface and plume-driven thinning favours a thicker interface. Conversely, the interface thickness decreases with increasing source buoyancy flux, although the dependence is relatively weak. Our analysis presents two models for predicting the interface thickness as a function of the enclosure height, base area, composite vent area, plume buoyancy flux and buoyancy diffusivity. Model results are compared with interface thickness measurements based on previously reported data. Positive qualitative and quantitative agreement is observed.|
|Description: ||This is an article from the Journal of Fluid Mechanics, [© Cambridge University Press] and the definitive version is available at: http://journals.cambridge.org/action/displayJournal?jid=FLM|
|Publisher Link: ||http://journals.cambridge.org/action/displayJournal?jid=FLM|
|Appears in Collections:||Published Articles (Civil and Building Engineering)|
Files associated with this item:
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.