Loughborough University
Leicestershire, UK
LE11 3TU
+44 (0)1509 263171
Loughborough University

Loughborough University Institutional Repository

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://dspace.lboro.ac.uk/2134/8958

Title: Key risk factors and risk mitigation measures for target cost contracts in construction - a comparison between the West and the East
Authors: Chan, Joseph H.L.
Chan, Daniel W.M.
Lord, Wayne E.
Keywords: Comparative law
Construction contracts
Hong Kong
Risk
Target cost contracts
Issue Date: 2011
Publisher: © Sweet & Maxwell
Citation: CHAN, J.H.L., CHAN, D.W.M. and LORD, W.E., 2011. Key risk factors and risk mitigation measures for target cost contracts in construction - a comparison between the West and the East. Construction Law Journal, 27(6), pp. 441-458
Abstract: This article is an extension of a research article published in the July 2010 issue of the Construction Law Journal in which the findings of seven face-to-face structured interviews, conducted in Hong Kong, on the perceptions of key risk factors and risk mitigation measures for Guaranteed Maximum Price (GMP) contracts and Target Cost Contracts (TCC) were reported. Further to this previous research undertaken in Hong Kong, five similar in-depth structured interviews were conducted in the United Kingdom. The interviewees perceived the change in scope of work, quality and clarity of tender documents, selection of competent subcontractors and unforeseen ground conditions as key risk factors encountered in GMP/TCC construction projects. They also considered a basket of measures including: the adjudication of bids in risk assessment; total reflection on potential risks in tender documents; use of risk registers; and development of a proper risk management process, as being effective in risk mitigation. The UK findings were compared and contrasted with those from Hong Kong. It was found that the key risk factors associated with GMP/TCC contracts between the two jurisdictions are similar by nature in general. However, differences in perceptions on risk mitigation measures are also observed, which may be due to the disparities in the implementation of GMP/TCC methodology between the two regions.
Description: This article is closed access, it was published in the journal, Construction Law Journal [© Sweet & Maxwell ]
Version: Closed access
URI: https://dspace.lboro.ac.uk/2134/8958
Publisher Link: http://url.ie/dcj4
ISSN: 0267-2359
Appears in Collections:Closed Access (Civil and Building Engineering)

Files associated with this item:

File Description SizeFormat
chan.pdf989.75 kBAdobe PDFView/Open

 

SFX Query

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.